• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词频在图片命名和性别判断中具有相似的影响:对耶施尼亚克和莱尔特(1994年)研究结果的未能重复验证。

Word frequency has similar effects in picture naming and gender decision: A failure to replicate Jescheniak and Levelt (1994).

作者信息

Corps Ruth E, Meyer Antje S

机构信息

Psychology of Language Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Netherlands.

Psychology of Language Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Netherlands; Donders Centre of Cognition and Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Nov;241:104073. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104073. Epub 2023 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104073
PMID:37948879
Abstract

Word frequency plays a key role in theories of lexical access, which assume that the word frequency effect (WFE, faster access to high-frequency than low-frequency words) occurs as a result of differences in the representation and processing of the words. In a seminal paper, Jescheniak and Levelt (1994) proposed that the WFE arises during the retrieval of word forms, rather than the retrieval of their syntactic representations (their lemmas) or articulatory commands. An important part of Jescheniak and Levelt's argument was that they found a stable WFE in a picture naming task, which requires complete lexical access, but not in a gender decision task, which only requires access to the words' lemmas and not their word forms. We report two attempts to replicate this pattern, one with new materials, and one with Jescheniak and Levelt's orginal pictures. In both studies we found a strong WFE when the pictures were shown for the first time, but much weaker effects on their second and third presentation. Importantly these patterns were seen in both the picture naming and the gender decision tasks, suggesting that either word frequency does not exclusively affect word form retrieval, or that the gender decision task does not exclusively tap lemma access.

摘要

词频在词汇通达理论中起着关键作用,这些理论认为词频效应(WFE,高频词比低频词的通达速度更快)是由于单词在表征和加工方面的差异而产生的。在一篇具有开创性的论文中,耶施尼亚克和莱尔特(1994)提出词频效应出现在词形检索过程中,而非其句法表征(词元)或发音指令的检索过程中。耶施尼亚克和莱尔特观点的一个重要部分是,他们在图片命名任务(该任务需要完整的词汇通达)中发现了稳定的词频效应,但在性别判断任务中却没有发现,后者只需要通达单词的词元而不需要其词形。我们报告了两次复制这种模式的尝试,一次使用新材料,另一次使用耶施尼亚克和莱尔特原来的图片。在两项研究中,我们都发现当图片首次呈现时存在很强的词频效应,但在第二次和第三次呈现时效应要弱得多。重要的是,在图片命名任务和性别判断任务中都出现了这些模式,这表明要么词频并非仅影响词形检索,要么性别判断任务并非仅涉及词元通达。

相似文献

1
Word frequency has similar effects in picture naming and gender decision: A failure to replicate Jescheniak and Levelt (1994).词频在图片命名和性别判断中具有相似的影响:对耶施尼亚克和莱尔特(1994年)研究结果的未能重复验证。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Nov;241:104073. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104073. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
2
Are age-of-acquisition effects on object naming due simply to differences in object recognition? Comments on levelt (2002).习得年龄对物体命名的影响仅仅是由于物体识别方面的差异吗?对莱尔特(2002年)的评论。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jul;34(5):1172-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03193263.
3
Syntactic processes in speech production: the retrieval of grammatical gender.言语产生中的句法过程:语法性别的提取。
Cognition. 1997 Aug;64(2):115-52. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00026-7.
4
Lexical access in semantic variant PPA: Evidence for a post-semantic contribution to naming deficits.语义变异型进行性失语症中的词汇通达:命名缺陷的语义后贡献的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Nov;106:90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.08.032. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
5
How word comprehension exposures facilitate later spoken production: implications for lexical processing and repetition priming.词汇理解暴露如何促进后期口语产生:对词汇加工和重复启动的启示。
Memory. 2021 Jan;29(1):39-58. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1845740. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
6
Different Loci of Semantic Interference in Picture Naming vs. Word-Picture Matching Tasks.图片命名与词图匹配任务中语义干扰的不同位点。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 13;7:710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00710. eCollection 2016.
7
Phonological activation in anaphoric lexical access (ALA).
Brain Lang. 1999;68(1-2):40-5. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2112.
8
Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.追踪图片-文字处理的时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Dec;109(4):373-92. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.109.4.373.
9
Are lexical representations graded or discrete?词汇表征是渐变的还是离散的?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May;77(5):909-923. doi: 10.1177/17470218231187027. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
10
What determines the speed of lexical access: homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al. (2003).是什么决定了词汇通达的速度:同音词还是特定词频?对耶施尼亚克等人(2003年)的回应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):278-82. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.278.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual differences in online research: Comparing lab-based and online administration of a psycholinguistic battery of linguistic and domain-general skills.在线研究中的个体差异:比较基于实验室和在线方式施测的一套语言及领域通用技能的心理语言学测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 19;57(1):22. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02533-x.
2
The influence of familiarisation and item repetition on the name agreement effect in picture naming.熟悉度和项目重复对图片命名中名称一致性效应的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jul;78(7):1487-1499. doi: 10.1177/17470218241274661. Epub 2024 Sep 12.