• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下颈椎经关节螺钉与钢板固定系统的生物力学研究

[Biomechanical study on transarticular screw and plate fixation syetem in the lower cervical spine].

作者信息

Liu Guan-Yi, Xu Rong-Ming, Ma Wei-Hu, Sun Shao-Hua, Feng Jian-Xiang, Wang Yi-Jin

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Sixth Hospital of Ningbo, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2010 Jun;23(6):451-3.

PMID:20669581
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cervical stabilities of transarticular screw fixation alone, and transarticular screw and plate fixation system.

METHODS

Twelve specimens of cervical vertebra containing C2-T1 were obtained from human cadaver. The three-column instability model was made at C4.5 and C5.6 levels. The specimens were stabilized with transarticular screw fixation alone, and transarticular screw and plate fixation system respectively. The ranges of motion of segments including intact group, transarticular screw fixation alone group and transarticular screw and plate fixation system group were measured under the torque of 2.0 N x m in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and torsion respectively under nonrestrictive and nondestructive condition.

RESULTS

The rang of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) of both transarticular screw fixation alone and transarticular screw and plate fixation system group were significantly smaller than those of intact group in all directions (P < 0.05). The transarticular screw and plate fixation system group allowed a very smaller ROM and NZ than transarticular screw fixation alone during extension, lateral bending and axial rotation except flexion (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Cervical transarticular screw and plate fixation system provides better stability than transarticular screw fixation alone. If the transarticular fixation technique is preferred, transarticular screw and plate fixation system will be beneficial.

摘要

目的

比较单纯经关节螺钉固定与经关节螺钉及钢板固定系统的颈椎稳定性。

方法

从人体尸体获取12个包含C2 - T1的颈椎标本。在C4.5和C5.6水平建立三柱不稳模型。标本分别采用单纯经关节螺钉固定以及经关节螺钉及钢板固定系统进行稳定。在非限制性和非破坏性条件下,分别在2.0 N·m的扭矩下测量完整组、单纯经关节螺钉固定组和经关节螺钉及钢板固定系统组各节段在屈伸、侧屈和扭转时的活动范围。

结果

单纯经关节螺钉固定组和经关节螺钉及钢板固定系统组在所有方向上的活动范围(ROM)和中性区(NZ)均显著小于完整组(P < 0.05)。除屈曲外,经关节螺钉及钢板固定系统组在伸展、侧屈和轴向旋转时的ROM和NZ比单纯经关节螺钉固定组更小(P < 0.05)。

结论

颈椎经关节螺钉及钢板固定系统比单纯经关节螺钉固定提供更好的稳定性。如果首选经关节固定技术,经关节螺钉及钢板固定系统将是有益的。

相似文献

1
[Biomechanical study on transarticular screw and plate fixation syetem in the lower cervical spine].下颈椎经关节螺钉与钢板固定系统的生物力学研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2010 Jun;23(6):451-3.
2
Biomechanical analysis comparing three C1-C2 transarticular screw salvaging fixation techniques.比较三种 C1-C2 经关节螺钉挽救固定技术的生物力学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Feb 15;35(4):378-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bc9cb5.
3
[The biomechanical study of craniovertebral junction fixation with posterior transarticular screw].[后路经关节螺钉固定颅颈交界区的生物力学研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Apr 4;86(13):872-5.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.枕颈胸融合术的生物力学评估:部分或序贯固定的影响
Spine J. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):821-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.05.008. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
5
Biomechanical comparison of occiput-C1-C2 fixation techniques: C0-C1 transarticular screw and direct occiput condyle screw.寰枢椎后路固定技术的生物力学比较:经寰枢关节螺钉和直接枕骨髁螺钉。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 20;37(12):E696-701. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182436669.
6
Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.两级颈椎锁定后路螺钉/棒与钩/棒技术的生物力学比较
Spine J. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):194-204. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.015. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
7
Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws.四种C1至C2刚性固定技术的生物力学比较:前路经关节、后路经关节、C1至C2椎弓根以及C1至C2椎板间螺钉。
Neurosurgery. 2006 Mar;58(3):516-21; discussion 516-21. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000197222.05299.31.
8
Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.使用前路腰骶固定螺钉钢板进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的生物力学评估:与单纯腰椎前路椎间融合术及在不稳定人体尸体模型中使用椎弓根螺钉进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):762-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206360.83728.d2.
9
A biomechanical comparison of a novel thoracic screw fixation method: transarticular screw fixation vs traditional pedicle screw fixation.一种新型胸椎螺钉固定方法的生物力学比较:经关节螺钉固定与传统椎弓根螺钉固定。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Dec;69(2 Suppl Operative):ons141-5; discussion ons146. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821867de.
10
Biomechanical comparison of C1-C2 posterior arthrodesis techniques.C1-C2 后路关节融合术技术的生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jun 1;32(13):E363-70. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318060cc65.