• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous automated lumbar nucleotomy. Comparison with traditional macro-procedure discectomy.经皮自动腰椎髓核切除术的成本效益。与传统开放式椎间盘切除术的比较。
Interv Neuroradiol. 1999 Mar 30;5(1):35-42. doi: 10.1177/159101999900500106. Epub 2001 May 15.
2
Discectomy strategies for lumbar disc herniation: study design and implications for clinical research.腰椎间盘突出症的椎间盘切除术策略:研究设计及对临床研究的意义
J Clin Neurosci. 2002 Jul;9(4):440-6. doi: 10.1054/jocn.2002.1128.
3
4
Percutaneus nucleotomy procedures in lumbar spinal disc prolapse.
Orthopade. 1999 Jul;28(7):598-608. doi: 10.1007/PL00003648.
5
Percutaneous automated lumbar nucleotomy.经皮自动腰椎髓核切除术
J Neuroradiol. 1989;16(3):203-13.
6
Microinvasive lumbar disc surgery. A study on patients treated with microdiscectomy or percutaneous nucleotomy for disc herniation.微创腰椎间盘手术。一项关于采用显微椎间盘切除术或经皮髓核摘除术治疗椎间盘突出症患者的研究。
Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl. 1994;209:1-50.
7
An updated review of automated percutaneous mechanical lumbar discectomy for the contained herniated lumbar disc.经皮机械腰椎间盘切除术治疗包容性腰椎间盘突出症的最新综述。
Pain Physician. 2013 Apr;16(2 Suppl):SE151-84.
8
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
9
[Percutaneous nucleotomy procedures in lumbar intervertebral disk displacement. Current status].[经皮腰椎间盘突出症髓核摘除术。现状]
Orthopade. 1999 Jul;28(7):598-608. doi: 10.1007/s001320050390.
10
[Percutaneous automated lumbar nucleotomy].
J Radiol. 1990 Jun-Jul;71(6-7):401-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive surgical procedures for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.用于治疗腰椎间盘突出症的微创手术方法。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2005 Nov 15;1:Doc07.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-Procedure CT Follow-up after Percutaneous Automated Lumbar Nucleotomy.经皮自动腰椎髓核摘除术后的CT随访
Interv Neuroradiol. 1996 Dec 20;2(4):283-6. doi: 10.1177/159101999600200406. Epub 2001 May 15.
2
Results of lumbar discectomy: a study using 15 different evaluation methods.腰椎间盘切除术的结果:使用 15 种不同评估方法的研究。
Eur Spine J. 1992 Jun;1(1):20-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00302137.
3
ENZYME DISSOLUTION OF THE NUCLEUS PULPOSUS IN HUMANS.人类髓核的酶溶解
JAMA. 1964 Jan 11;187:137-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.1964.03060150061016.
4
Clinical overall score: outcome evaluation after lumbar disc surgery, assessments of reliability and validity.
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1998 Dec;30(4):227-33. doi: 10.1080/003655098443977.
5
Side effects and complications of automated percutaneous lumbar nucleotomy.
Neuroradiology. 1997 Apr;39(4):282-5. doi: 10.1007/s002340050410.
6
Automated percutaneous nucleotomy: restricted indications based on CT scan appearance.自动经皮髓核切除术:基于CT扫描表现的受限适应证
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1996 Jan;7(1):43-7.
7
CT-diskography, diskomanometry and MR imaging as predictors of the outcome of lumbar percutaneous automated nucleotomy.
Acta Radiol. 1995 Nov;36(6):613-9.
8
The lumbar microdiscectomy.
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993;251:34-7. doi: 10.3109/17453679309160112.
9
Automated percutaneous discectomy. Long-term clinical experience with the Nucleotome system.
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993;251:30-3. doi: 10.3109/17453679309160111.
10
Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy versus chemonucleolysis in the treatment of sciatica. A randomized multicenter trial.自动经皮腰椎间盘切除术与化学髓核溶解术治疗坐骨神经痛的随机多中心试验
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jan;18(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199301000-00001.

经皮自动腰椎髓核切除术的成本效益。与传统开放式椎间盘切除术的比较。

Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous automated lumbar nucleotomy. Comparison with traditional macro-procedure discectomy.

作者信息

Dullerud R, Lie H, Magnæs B

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Aker University Hospital; Center for Health Administration, The National Hospital; Oslo, Norway -

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 1999 Mar 30;5(1):35-42. doi: 10.1177/159101999900500106. Epub 2001 May 15.

DOI:10.1177/159101999900500106
PMID:20670489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4268663/
Abstract

This study was conducted in order to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous automated lumbar nucleotomy in comparison with traditional macro-procedure discectomy in the treatment of herniated discs. Sixty-eight patients undergoing surgical procedures and 90 treated with nucleotomy were consecutively included. Both cohorts were assessed pre-operatively and at regular intervals for one year or more after treatment by independent observers, using a clinical overall scoring system (COS) with 0 being the best attainable result and 1000 the poorest conceivable status of the patients. There were better clinical results after surgery with 78% successes after one year compared to 62% after nucleotomy. By including subsequent operations and re-operations after failure to respond to the primary treatment, the success rates rose to 79% and 77%, respectively. The cost of surgical treatment was calculated to USD 6.119 per patient and the cost of a nucleotomy procedure was USD 1.252. Owing to an almost five times higher price of surgery than nucleotomy, the latter turned out to be 2.7 to 3.9 times more cost-effective, depending on whether secondary treatment was included or not. Due to the minimal difference in final outcome between the groups, however, the marginal cost per extra success in patients primarily treated with surgery was as high as USD 205.850. The study concludes that nucleotomy, as a mini-invasive procedure with low complication rates and the potential of a quick recovery, is more cost-effective than traditional surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation.

摘要

本研究旨在评估经皮自动腰椎髓核切除术与传统开放式椎间盘切除术治疗椎间盘突出症的成本效益。连续纳入了68例接受外科手术的患者和90例接受髓核切除术的患者。两组患者在术前以及治疗后由独立观察者进行为期一年或更长时间的定期评估,采用临床综合评分系统(COS),0分为患者可达到的最佳结果,1000分为最差的可能状态。手术后临床效果更佳,一年后手术成功率为78%,而髓核切除术为62%。若将初次治疗无效后的后续手术和再次手术纳入计算,成功率分别升至79%和77%。手术治疗的成本计算为每位患者6119美元,髓核切除术的成本为1252美元。由于手术价格几乎是髓核切除术的五倍,因此髓核切除术的成本效益高出2.7至3.9倍,具体取决于是否纳入二次治疗。然而,由于两组最终结果差异极小,主要接受手术治疗的患者每多获得一次成功的边际成本高达205850美元。该研究得出结论,髓核切除术作为一种并发症发生率低且有望快速康复的微创手术,在治疗腰椎间盘突出症方面比传统手术治疗更具成本效益。