Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Oct;109(4):959-65. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00532.2010. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
Recommendations for the measurement of brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) typically suggest images be obtained at identical times in the cardiac cycle, usually end diastole (QRS complex onset). This recommendation presumes that inter-individual differences in arterial compliance are minimized. However, published evidence is conflicting. Furthermore, ECG gating is not available on many ultrasound systems; it requires an expensive software upgrade or increased image processing time. We tested whether analysis of images acquired with QRS gating or with the more simplified method of image averaging would yield similar results. We analyzed FMD and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (NMD) in 29 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in 31 older adults and 12 young adults without diabetes, yielding a range of brachial artery distensibility. FMD and NMD were measured using recommended QRS-gated brachial artery diameter measurements and, alternatively, the average brachial diameters over the entire R-R interval. We found strong agreement between both methods for FMD and NMD (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.88-0.99). Measuring FMD and NMD using average diameter measurements significantly reduced post-image-processing time (658.9 ± 71.6 vs. 1,024.1 ± 167.6 s for QRS-gated analysis, P < 0.001). FMD and NMD measurements based on average diameter measurements can be performed without reducing accuracy. This finding may allow for simplification of FMD measurement and aid in the development of FMD as a potentially useful clinical tool.
推荐使用 QRS 波门控技术获取肱动脉血流介导的扩张(FMD)图像,通常是在心动周期的相同时间点获取图像,通常是舒张末期(QRS 波群起始)。这一推荐假设个体动脉顺应性的差异最小化。然而,已发表的证据存在冲突。此外,许多超声系统无法使用心电图门控技术;需要昂贵的软件升级或增加图像处理时间。我们测试了使用 QRS 门控技术或更简单的图像平均法获取图像是否会产生相似的结果。我们分析了 29 例 2 型糖尿病患者、31 例老年患者和 12 例非糖尿病年轻患者的 FMD 和硝酸甘油介导的扩张(NMD),获得了一系列肱动脉扩张性。使用推荐的 QRS 门控肱动脉直径测量法和替代的整个 R-R 间隔内的平均肱动脉直径测量法,分别测量 FMD 和 NMD。我们发现两种方法的 FMD 和 NMD 之间具有很强的一致性(组内相关系数=0.88-0.99)。使用平均直径测量法测量 FMD 和 NMD 显著减少了图像处理后的时间(658.9 ± 71.6 秒 vs. QRS 门控分析的 1,024.1 ± 167.6 秒,P<0.001)。基于平均直径测量的 FMD 和 NMD 测量可以在不降低准确性的情况下进行。这一发现可能简化了 FMD 的测量,并有助于将 FMD 作为一种潜在有用的临床工具进行发展。