Suppr超能文献

活体分析调节和轴向屈光不正时睫状肌形态变化。

In vivo analysis of ciliary muscle morphologic changes with accommodation and axial ametropia.

机构信息

Ophthalmic Research Group, Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec;51(12):6882-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5787. Epub 2010 Jul 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To use anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to analyze ciliary muscle morphology and changes with accommodation and axial ametropia.

METHODS

Fifty prepresbyopic volunteers, aged 19 to 34 years were recruited. High-resolution images were acquired of nasal and temporal ciliary muscles in the relaxed state and at stimulus vergence levels of -4 and -8 D. Objective accommodative responses and axial lengths were also recorded. Two-way, mixed-factor analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were used to assess the changes in ciliary muscle parameters with accommodation and determine whether these changes are dependent on the nasal-temporal aspect or axial length, whereas linear regression analysis was used to analyze the relationship between axial length and ciliary muscle length.

RESULTS

The ciliary muscle was longer (r = 0.34, P = 0.02), but not significantly thicker (F = 2.84, P = 0.06), in eyes with greater axial length. With accommodation, the ciliary muscle showed a contractile shortening (F = 42.9. P < 0.001), particularly anteriorly (F = 177.2, P < 0.001), and a thickening of the anterior portion (F= 46.2, P < 0.001). The ciliary muscle was thicker (F = 17.8, P < 0.001) and showed a greater contractile response on the temporal side.

CONCLUSIONS

The accommodative changes observed support an anterior, as well as centripetal, contractile shift of ciliary muscle mass.

摘要

目的

使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)分析睫状肌形态及其在调节和轴向屈光不正中的变化。

方法

招募了 50 名 19 至 34 岁的未老花志愿者。在松弛状态和刺激聚散水平-4 和-8 D 时,采集鼻侧和颞侧睫状肌的高分辨率图像。还记录了客观调节反应和眼轴长度。采用双向、混合因素方差分析(ANOVA)来评估睫状肌参数随调节的变化,并确定这些变化是否依赖于鼻颞侧或眼轴长度,而线性回归分析则用于分析眼轴长度与睫状肌长度之间的关系。

结果

眼轴较长的眼睛睫状肌较长(r = 0.34,P = 0.02),但厚度无显著差异(F = 2.84,P = 0.06)。随着调节,睫状肌表现出收缩缩短(F = 42.9,P < 0.001),尤其是在前面(F = 177.2,P < 0.001),前部变厚(F = 46.2,P < 0.001)。睫状肌较厚(F = 17.8,P < 0.001),颞侧收缩反应更大。

结论

观察到的调节变化支持睫状肌质量的前向和向心性收缩移位。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验