University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Acad Med. 2010 Nov;85(11):1794-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e7218c.
Most medical schools and postgraduate programs devote some time to teaching evidence-based medicine (EBM). EBM encompasses five essential skills, including constructing a sound clinical question, literature searching, critical appraisal, gaining a full understanding of study results, and integration of results into patient care. Gaining a full understanding of results requires understanding the statistical aspects of and terminology associated with the design, analysis, and results of original research--hereby referred to as physician numeracy. Physicians and physicians-in-training recognize the importance of these concepts but are uncomfortable with and demonstrate poor knowledge of the quantitative aspects of research. This is not surprising since few curricula include physician numeracy. Current approaches to teaching EBM rely on journal clubs, which have not been shown to improve participants' self-perceived EBM skills. In this paper we describe a novel approach to teaching EBM which makes use of five guiding principles: (1) Journal clubs have important limitations, (2) understanding the quantitative aspects of research promotes an in-depth understanding of papers, (3) physician numeracy can form the basis of an EBM course, (4) consumers of original research ought to determine what is useful about a paper rather than whether or not it is useful, and (5) numeracy should encompass only those concepts needed to accurately interpret evidence and apply it to individual patients. An EBM curriculum based on physician numeracy is described, together with the challenges inherent to this approach.
大多数医学院校和研究生课程都将一些时间用于教授循证医学(EBM)。EBM 涵盖了五项基本技能,包括构建合理的临床问题、文献检索、批判性评价、充分理解研究结果以及将结果整合到患者护理中。要充分理解结果,需要理解设计、分析和原始研究结果相关的统计方面和术语——在这里称为医生计算能力。医生和医学生都认识到这些概念的重要性,但他们对研究的定量方面感到不舒服且表现出较差的知识。这并不奇怪,因为很少有课程包括医生计算能力。目前教授 EBM 的方法依赖于期刊俱乐部,但并没有显示出它们可以提高参与者自我感知的 EBM 技能。在本文中,我们描述了一种教授 EBM 的新方法,该方法利用了五个指导原则:(1)期刊俱乐部有重要的局限性;(2)理解研究的定量方面可以促进对论文的深入理解;(3)医生计算能力可以成为 EBM 课程的基础;(4)原始研究的消费者应该确定论文的有用之处,而不是它是否有用;(5)计算能力应仅包括准确解释证据并将其应用于个体患者所需的概念。描述了一个基于医生计算能力的 EBM 课程,以及该方法所固有的挑战。