Buckingham H W
Department of Communication Disorders and Interdepartmental Program in Linguistics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Clin Linguist Phon. 1992;6(1-2):41-63. doi: 10.3109/02699209208985518.
The mechanisms involved in the production of phonemic paraphasias are considered in this paper. Initially, a taxonomy of error types is provided where it is argued that there is a significant qualitative overlap in the kinds of errors witnessed in phonemic paraphasias and in segmental slips-of-the-tongue. There is ample historical precedent for the observation of this qualitative relation between fluent paraphasic errors and the phonemic errors in normal lapsus linguae. Some researchers have played down this qualitative similarity, but it is shown that when certain non-fluent aphasic phenomena are dissociated from the fluent paraphasias, the qualitative relation between paraphasias and slips remains entirely feasible. The metaphorical nature of the entire enterprise of characterizing phonemic paraphasias is briefly outlined, and finally the mechanisms at work are analysed from three rather different viewpoints: Merrill Garretts serial/hierarchical model of production; connectionist theory; and the phonological theory of underspecification.
本文探讨了音素性错语产生的机制。首先,提供了一个错误类型的分类法,其中指出,在音素性错语和音段性口误中所观察到的错误类型存在显著的质性重叠。对于流利性错语错误与正常口误中的音素错误之间这种质性关系的观察,有丰富的历史先例。一些研究者淡化了这种质性相似性,但研究表明,当某些非流利性失语现象与流利性错语分离时,错语与口误之间的质性关系仍然完全成立。简要概述了描述音素性错语整个过程的隐喻性质,最后从三个截然不同的观点分析了起作用的机制:梅里尔·加勒特的串行/层级生成模型;联结主义理论;以及特征不充分的音系学理论。