Basso A, Corno M, Marangolo P
Neurological Clinic, Milan University, Italy.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1996 Feb;18(1):77-87. doi: 10.1080/01688639608408264.
Impaired naming is a common finding in aphasia but while it is known that naming errors diminish over time, longitudinal studies are rare. In this retrospective study, naming errors of 84 vascular aphasic patients are studied. Errors in oral and written confrontation naming tasks in two successive evaluations are tabulated and coded into one of 10 error types. No Response, Word-Finding Difficulty, Semantic Paraphasia, Unrelated Paraphasia, Phonemic/Orthographic Paraphasia, Neologism, Paraphasic Jargon, Phonemic/Neologistic Jargon, Stereotypy, and Other. All analyses were carried out on the difference scores, that is, the score in the second examination minus the score in the first examination. Results indicate that there is a significant decrease of No Responses (in oral and written naming) and Neologisms (in oral naming), and a significant increase of Orthographic Paraphasias in written naming. Moreover, the difference score for Phonemic/Orthographic Paraphasias was higher in written than oral naming. The difference scores for the other types of error were not statistically significant.
命名障碍是失语症中的常见表现,虽然已知命名错误会随时间减少,但纵向研究却很少见。在这项回顾性研究中,对84例血管性失语症患者的命名错误进行了研究。将两次连续评估中口语和书面的对答命名任务中的错误进行列表,并编码为10种错误类型之一:无反应、找词困难、语义性错语、无关错语、音素/拼字法错语、新语症、错语性行话、音素/新语症性行话、刻板言语及其他。所有分析均基于差值分数进行,即第二次检查的分数减去第一次检查的分数。结果表明,无反应(口语和书面命名中)和新语症(口语命名中)显著减少,书面命名中拼字法错语显著增加。此外,音素/拼字法错语的差值分数在书面命名中高于口语命名。其他类型错误的差值分数无统计学意义。