Moerman C, Saerens J, Guleac J
Acta Neurol Belg. 1985 Mar-Apr;85(2):110-22.
A factor analysis of 4612 errors recorded among the 12 200 responses made by 61 non-selected aphasiacs, during a visual naming task, was performed; the 14 variables were mostly errors described by the neurologic terminology. The existence of a phonemic and a semantic articulation level was confirmed. A feedback system opening the way to alternative responses ("escape mechanisms") was disclosed. Phonemic paraphasias were the most specific errors at the phonemic level, whereas perseverations turned out to be the purest representative at the semantic one. Verbal semantic paraphasias were apparently not a lesser degree of verbal paraphasias but errors of a different nature (Acta neurol. belg., 1985, 85, 110-122).
对61名未经挑选的失语症患者在视觉命名任务中做出的12200份回答中记录的4612个错误进行了因素分析；14个变量大多是用神经学术语描述的错误。证实了音素和语义发音水平的存在。揭示了一种为替代反应开辟道路的反馈系统（“逃避机制”）。音素性错语是音素水平上最具特异性的错误，而持续现象则是语义水平上最纯粹的代表。言语性语义错语显然不是程度较轻的言语性错语，而是性质不同的错误（《比利时神经学学报》，1985年，85卷，110 - 122页）。
