Trauma Unit, Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal, Kirkeveien 166, N-0407 Oslo, Norway.
Injury. 2012 Jan;43(1):62-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.06.028. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
After introducing splenic artery embolisation (SAE) in the institutional treatment protocol for splenic injury, we wanted to evaluate the effects of SAE on splenic function and assess the need for immunisation in SAE treated patients.
15 SAE patients and 14 splenectomised (SPL) patients were included and 29 healthy blood donors volunteered as controls. Clinical examination, medical history, general blood counts, immunoglobulin quantifications and flowcytometric analysis of lymphocyte phenotypes were performed. Peripheral blood smears from all patients and controls were examined for Howell-Jolly (H-J) bodies. Abdominal doppler, gray scale and contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) were performed on all the SAE patients.
Leukocyte and platelet counts were elevated in both SAE and SPL individuals compared to controls. The proportion of memory B-lymphocytes did not differ significantly from controls in either group. In the SAE group total IgA, IgM and IgG levels as well as pneumococcal serotype specific IgG and IgM antibody levels did not differ from the control group. In the SPL group total IgA and IgG Pneumovax(®) (PPV23) antibody levels were significantly increased, and 5 of 12 pneumococcal serotype specific IgGs and IgMs were significantly elevated. H-J bodies were only detected in the SPL group. CEUS confirmed normal sized and well perfused spleens in all SAE patients.
In our study non-operative management (NOM) of high grade splenic injuries including SAE, was followed by an increase in total leukocyte and platelet counts. Normal levels of immunoglobulins and memory B cells, absence of H-J bodies and preserved splenic size and intraparenchymal blood flow suggest that SAE has only minor impact on splenic function and that immunisation probably is unnecessary.
在机构治疗方案中引入脾动脉栓塞(SAE)治疗脾损伤后,我们想要评估 SAE 对脾功能的影响,并评估 SAE 治疗患者是否需要免疫接种。
纳入了 15 例 SAE 患者和 14 例脾切除术(SPL)患者,并招募了 29 名健康献血者作为对照。进行了临床检查、病史、全血细胞计数、免疫球蛋白定量和淋巴细胞表型的流式细胞术分析。所有患者和对照者的外周血涂片均进行了 Howell-Jolly(H-J)小体检查。对所有 SAE 患者进行了腹部多普勒、灰阶和对比增强超声(CEUS)检查。
与对照组相比,SAE 和 SPL 个体的白细胞和血小板计数均升高。两组记忆 B 淋巴细胞的比例与对照组无显著差异。在 SAE 组中,总 IgA、IgM 和 IgG 水平以及肺炎球菌血清型特异性 IgG 和 IgM 抗体水平与对照组无差异。在 SPL 组中,总 IgA 和 IgG 肺炎球菌疫苗(PPV23)抗体水平显著升高,12 种肺炎球菌血清型特异性 IgG 和 IgM 中有 5 种显著升高。仅在 SPL 组中检测到 H-J 小体。CEUS 证实所有 SAE 患者的脾脏大小和血流灌注正常。
在我们的研究中,高等级脾损伤的非手术治疗(NOM)包括 SAE 后,总白细胞和血小板计数增加。免疫球蛋白和记忆 B 细胞水平正常,无 H-J 小体,脾脏大小和实质内血流保持不变,提示 SAE 对脾功能的影响较小,可能不需要免疫接种。