Department of Neurology, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin-24, Ireland.
Ir J Med Sci. 2011 Mar;180(1):31-5. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0542-y. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
An audit of the hospital notes and letters of patients with epilepsy sent to general practitioners was undertaken.
(a) To examine the frequency of important omissions in history taking and role of precipitants in seizure control, (b) to determine whether appropriate investigations had been performed and their results, (c) to assess whether letters sent to GPs contain all the appropriate information and advice, and to evaluate the waiting time for out-patient clinics and investigations.
This retrospective study was conducted in a teaching hospital setting. A computerised search of the clinical database of a consultant neurologist was performed on patients with epilepsy. The notes of the first 100 names selected randomly by the computer were analysed. The study period was during the years 1998-2005. Age range was from 17-72 years. The male:female ratio was 1:1.
Major deficiencies in documentation were identified in this study.
对送往全科医生的癫痫患者的医院记录和信函进行了审核。
(a)检查病史采集过程中重要遗漏的频率以及发作诱因在癫痫控制中的作用,(b)确定是否进行了适当的检查及其结果,(c)评估寄给全科医生的信件是否包含所有相关信息和建议,并评估门诊和检查的等待时间。
本研究在教学医院环境中进行。对一位顾问神经病学家的临床数据库进行了计算机检索。通过计算机随机选择的前 100 个姓名的记录进行了分析。研究期间为 1998 年至 2005 年。年龄范围为 17-72 岁。男女比例为 1:1。
本研究发现文档记录存在重大缺陷。