Kudale Abhay, Salve Solomon, Rangan Sheela, Kielmann Karina
Maharashtra Association of Anthropological Sciences, Centre for Health Research and Development (MAAS-CHRD), Pune, India.
AIDS Care. 2010;22 Suppl 1(S1):85-92. doi: 10.1080/09540121003758531.
The government of India launched the free anti-retroviral therapy (ART) initiative in 2004 and the programme has since scaled up expansion in a phased manner. Programme authorities acknowledge problems in scale-up, yet discussions have been restricted to operational constraints, with little consideration for how local health system responses to HIV/AIDS influence the delivery of ART. This paper draws on the perspectives of key informants and people living with HIV (PLHIV) to compare delivery of ART in two ART centres in the States of Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh at two distinct points of time. In 2005, data were collected through key informant interviews (KIIs) using interview guides and a survey of PLHIV using a semi-structured interview schedule. Differences were observed in the functioning and resources of the two centres, indicating different levels of preparedness which in turn influenced PLHIV's pathways in accessing ART. We examine these differences in the light of programme leadership, ownership and the roles of public, private and non-governmental organisation actors in HIV care. KIIs conducted during a follow-up visit in 2009 focused on changes in ART delivery. Many operational problems had been resolved; however, new challenges were emerging as a result of the increased patient load. An understanding of how ART programmes evolve within local health systems has bearing on future developments of the ART programme and must include a consideration of the wider socio-political environment within which HIV programmes are embedded.
印度政府于2004年启动了免费抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)倡议,此后该计划逐步扩大。计划当局承认在扩大规模方面存在问题,但讨论仅限于操作上的限制,很少考虑当地卫生系统对艾滋病毒/艾滋病的应对措施如何影响抗逆转录病毒疗法的提供。本文借鉴关键信息提供者和艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)的观点,比较了马哈拉施特拉邦和安得拉邦两个抗逆转录病毒疗法中心在两个不同时间点的抗逆转录病毒疗法提供情况。2005年,通过使用访谈指南的关键信息提供者访谈(KIIs)以及使用半结构化访谈时间表对艾滋病毒感染者进行的调查收集了数据。观察到两个中心在运作和资源方面存在差异,这表明准备程度不同,进而影响了艾滋病毒感染者获取抗逆转录病毒疗法的途径。我们根据计划领导、所有权以及公共、私营和非政府组织行为者在艾滋病毒护理中的作用来研究这些差异。2009年后续访问期间进行的关键信息提供者访谈重点关注抗逆转录病毒疗法提供情况的变化。许多操作问题已经得到解决;然而,由于患者负担增加,新的挑战正在出现。了解抗逆转录病毒疗法计划在当地卫生系统中的演变方式与抗逆转录病毒疗法计划的未来发展有关,并且必须考虑到艾滋病毒计划所处的更广泛的社会政治环境。