Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R148. doi: 10.1186/cc9216. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
Antifibrinolytic agents are commonly used during cardiac surgery to minimize bleeding. Because of safety concerns, aprotinin was withdrawn from the market in 2007. Since then, tranexamic acid (TXA) has become the antifibrinolytic treatment of choice in many heart centers. The safety profile of TXA has not been extensively studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficiency of TXA compared with aprotinin in cardiac surgery.
Since July 1, 2006, TXA has been administered at a dose of 50 mg/kg tranexamic acid before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and 50 mg/kg into the priming fluid of the CPB. Prior to this, all patients were treated with aprotinin at a dose of 50,000 KIU per kilogram body weight. Safety was evaluated with mortality, biomarkers, and the diagnosis of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, convulsive seizures, and acute renal failure in the intensive care unit (ICU), intermediate care unit (IMCU), and hospital stay. Efficiency was evaluated by the need for transfusion of blood products and total postoperative blood loss.
After informed consent, 893 patients were included in our database (557 consecutive patients receiving aprotinin and 336 patients receiving TXA). A subgroup of 320 patients undergoing open-heart procedures (105 receiving TXA and 215 receiving aprotinin) was analyzed separately. In the aprotinin group, a higher rate of late events of ischemic stroke (3.4% versus 0.9%; P = 0.02) and neurologic disability (5.8% versus 2.4%; P = 0.02) was found. The rate of postoperative convulsive seizures was increased in tendency in patients receiving TXA (2.7% versus 0.9%; P = 0.05). The use of TXA was associated with higher cumulative drainage losses (PANOVA < 0.01; Ptime < 0.01) and a higher rate of repeated thoracotomy for bleeding (6.9% versus 2.4%; P < 0.01). In the subgroup of patients with open-chamber procedures, mortality was higher in the TXA group (16.2% TXA versus 7.5% aprotinin; P = 0.02). Multivariate logistic regression identified EURO score II and CPB time as additional risk factors for this increased mortality.
The use of high-dose TXA is questioned, as our data suggest an association between higher mortality and minor efficiency while the safety profile of this drug is not consistently improved. Further confirmatory prospective studies evaluating the efficacy and safety profile of TXA are urgently needed to find a safe dosage for this antifibrinolytic drug.
在心脏手术中,通常使用抗纤维蛋白溶解剂来减少出血。由于安全问题,抑肽酶于 2007 年退出市场。从那时起,氨甲环酸(TXA)已成为许多心脏中心抗纤维蛋白溶解治疗的首选。TXA 的安全性尚未得到广泛研究。因此,本研究旨在评估 TXA 与心脏手术中抑肽酶相比的安全性和效率。
自 2006 年 7 月 1 日起,TXA 在体外循环(CPB)前以 50mg/kg 氨甲环酸的剂量给药,并在 CPB 的预充液中以 50mg/kg 的剂量给药。在此之前,所有患者均以 50,000 KIU/千克体重的剂量接受抑肽酶治疗。安全性通过死亡率、生物标志物以及重症监护病房(ICU)、中间护理病房(IMCU)和住院期间心肌梗死、缺血性中风、惊厥和急性肾功能衰竭的诊断来评估。效率通过血液制品的输注需求和总术后失血来评估。
在获得知情同意后,我们的数据库中包括了 893 名患者(557 名连续接受抑肽酶治疗的患者和 336 名接受 TXA 治疗的患者)。对接受心脏直视手术的 320 名患者(105 名接受 TXA 治疗和 215 名接受抑肽酶治疗)进行了亚组分析。在抑肽酶组中,发现缺血性中风(3.4%比 0.9%;P=0.02)和神经功能障碍(5.8%比 2.4%;P=0.02)的晚期事件发生率更高。接受 TXA 治疗的患者术后惊厥发作的发生率呈上升趋势(2.7%比 0.9%;P=0.05)。TXA 的使用与更高的累积引流损失(PANOVA<0.01;Ptime<0.01)和更高的因出血再次开胸的发生率(6.9%比 2.4%;P<0.01)相关。在接受开胸手术的患者亚组中,TXA 组的死亡率更高(TXA 组 16.2%,抑肽酶组 7.5%;P=0.02)。多变量逻辑回归确定 EURO 评分 II 和 CPB 时间是导致这种死亡率增加的额外危险因素。
高剂量 TXA 的使用受到质疑,因为我们的数据表明,更高的死亡率和较低的效率之间存在关联,而这种药物的安全性并未得到一致改善。迫切需要进一步的前瞻性研究来评估 TXA 的疗效和安全性,以找到这种抗纤维蛋白溶解药物的安全剂量。