Perioperative Clinical Research Core, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California at San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero St., San Francisco, CA, USA.
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Sep;105(3):255-63. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq191. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
No clear consensus exists on how to best prevent severe headache from occurring after accidental dural puncture. We conducted a quantitative systematic review to identify all available evidence for the prevention of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and included 17 studies with 1264 patients investigating prophylactic epidural blood patch (PEBP), epidural morphine, intrathecal catheters, and epidural or intrathecal saline. The relative risk (RR) for headache after PEBP was 0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-0.99] in five non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) and 0.32 (0.10-1.03) in four randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The RR for epidural morphine (based on a single RCT) was 0.25 (0.08-0.78). All other interventions were based on non-RCTs and failed statistical significance, including long-term intrathecal catheters with an RR of 0.21 (0.02-2.65). There are a number of promising options to prevent PDPH, yet heterogeneity between the studies and publication bias towards small non-RCTs with positive results limits the available evidence. Thus, a large multicentre RCT is needed to determine the best preventative practices.
目前对于如何最好地预防意外刺破硬脑膜后发生严重头痛,尚未达成明确共识。我们进行了一项定量系统综述,以确定所有可用于预防硬脊膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)的证据,并纳入了 17 项研究,涉及 1264 名患者,研究内容包括预防性硬膜外血贴(PEBP)、硬膜外吗啡、鞘内导管和硬膜外或鞘内生理盐水。5 项非随机对照试验(non-RCT)中,PEBP 后头痛的相对风险(RR)为 0.48 [95%置信区间(CI):0.23-0.99],4 项随机对照试验(RCT)中 RR 为 0.32(0.10-1.03)。基于一项 RCT 的硬膜外吗啡 RR 为 0.25(0.08-0.78)。其他所有干预措施均基于非 RCT,且未达到统计学意义,包括长期鞘内导管 RR 为 0.21(0.02-2.65)。有许多有前途的选择可以预防 PDPH,但研究之间存在异质性,且偏向于发表阳性结果的小型非 RCT,这限制了现有证据。因此,需要进行一项大型多中心 RCT 来确定最佳预防措施。