• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淘汰赛对儿童身体活动和心理社会反应的影响。

Effect of elimination games on physical activity and psychosocial responses in children.

机构信息

Dept of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2010 Jul;7(4):475-83. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.4.475.

DOI:10.1123/jpah.7.4.475
PMID:20683089
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the effect of elimination and nonelimination games on objectively measured physical activity and psychosocial responses in children.

METHODS

A total of 29 children in grades 4 to 6 (65.5% male; 10.5 +/- 1.0 years old) wore an accelerometer while participating in 2 elimination and 2 nonelimination games. Activity counts were collected using a 30-second epoch and converted to METs to determine minutes spent in sedentary behavior and light, moderate, vigorous, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Self-efficacy, enjoyment, and peer-victimization were assessed on 4 occasions (before and after 2 elimination and 2 nonelimination games).

RESULTS

Overall, girls spent more time in sedentary behavior compared with boys. Children engaged in significantly more moderate-to-vigorous physical activity during nonelimination games compared with elimination games. Furthermore, children significantly increased self-efficacy after playing both game sessions. A significant interaction between type of game and time of measurement in the prediction of enjoyment showed that enjoyment modestly increased after elimination games and slightly decreased after nonelimination games. There were no differences in peer-victimization.

CONCLUSION

This study provides preliminary evidence that nonelimination games provide more moderate-to-vigorous physical activity compared with elimination games, but elimination games may be more enjoyable.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了淘汰赛和非淘汰赛对儿童客观测量的身体活动和心理社会反应的影响。

方法

共有 29 名 4 至 6 年级的儿童(65.5%为男性;10.5±1.0 岁)在参加 2 场淘汰赛和 2 场非淘汰赛时佩戴了加速度计。使用 30 秒的时间间隔收集活动计数,并转换为 METs,以确定久坐行为以及轻、中、剧烈和中高强度身体活动所花费的时间。在 4 个时间点(参加 2 场淘汰赛和 2 场非淘汰赛前后)评估自我效能感、享受度和同伴侵害情况。

结果

总体而言,女孩比男孩花费更多的时间处于久坐行为中。与淘汰赛相比,儿童在非淘汰赛中进行了更多的中高强度身体活动。此外,儿童在参加完这两个游戏阶段后,自我效能感显著提高。游戏类型和测量时间在预测享受度方面存在显著的交互作用,表明在淘汰赛之后,享受度适度增加,而非淘汰赛之后则略有下降。同伴侵害情况没有差异。

结论

本研究初步表明,与淘汰赛相比,非淘汰赛提供了更多的中高强度身体活动,但淘汰赛可能更有趣。

相似文献

1
Effect of elimination games on physical activity and psychosocial responses in children.淘汰赛对儿童身体活动和心理社会反应的影响。
J Phys Act Health. 2010 Jul;7(4):475-83. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.4.475.
2
Association between objectively evaluated physical activity and sedentary behavior and screen time in primary school children.小学儿童客观评估的身体活动、久坐行为与屏幕时间之间的关联。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 May 2;10(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2495-y.
3
Physical Activity and Enjoyment in Parent-Child Dyads During Shared Physical Activity.亲子共享身体活动中父母-儿童对子的身体活动和乐趣。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2021 Mar;92(1):127-136. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2020.1712316. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
4
Children and adolescent physical activity participation and enjoyment during active play.儿童和青少年在积极游戏过程中的身体活动参与情况与愉悦感。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Oct;57(10):1375-1381. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06732-3. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
5
"I really like playing games together": Understanding what influences children with congenital heart disease to participate in physical activity.“我真的很喜欢一起玩游戏”:了解影响先天性心脏病儿童参与身体活动的因素。
Child Care Health Dev. 2020 Jul;46(4):457-467. doi: 10.1111/cch.12754. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
6
Does home equipment contribute to socioeconomic gradients in Australian children's physical activity, sedentary time and screen time?家用设备是否会影响澳大利亚儿童身体活动、久坐时间和屏幕时间方面的社会经济梯度?
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 5;16:736. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3419-9.
7
Objectively evaluated physical activity and sedentary time in primary school children by gender, grade and types of physical education lessons.客观评估小学生的体育活动和久坐时间,按性别、年级和体育课类型进行分析。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 2;18(1):948. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5910-y.
8
An active video game intervention does not improve physical activity and sedentary time of children at-risk for developmental coordination disorder: a crossover randomized trial.一项关于电子游戏干预的研究表明,对于有发展性协调障碍风险的儿童,这种干预并不能改善他们的身体活动水平和久坐时间:一项交叉随机试验。
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Mar;42(2):253-60. doi: 10.1111/cch.12305. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
9
Does a single bout of exercise influence subsequent physical activity and sedentary time in overweight boys?单次运动对超重男孩随后的身体活动和久坐时间有影响吗?
Physiol Behav. 2017 May 1;173:231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
10
Objectively measured physical activity patterns, sedentary time and parent-reported screen-time across the day in four-year-old Swedish children.瑞典四岁儿童全天客观测量的身体活动模式、久坐时间及家长报告的屏幕使用时间。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4600-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequality in Children's Physical Activity Across Time-Segmented Youth Sport Practice.分段式青少年体育活动中儿童身体活动的不平等现象。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2025 Mar;96(1):96-108. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2024.2367565. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
2
Correlates of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children attending before and after school care: a systematic review.参加课前和课后托管的儿童身体活动和久坐行为的相关性:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 16;22(1):2364. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14675-8.
3
The behavioral effects of cooperative and competitive board games in preschoolers.
幼儿合作和竞争棋盘游戏的行为影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2021 Jun;62(3):355-364. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12708. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
4
Physical activity patterns across time-segmented youth sport flag football practice.青少年足球运动分时段练习中体育活动模式。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 8;18(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5108-3.
5
Are We There Yet? Compliance with Physical Activity Standards in YMCA Afterschool Programs.我们做到了吗?基督教青年会课后项目中体育活动标准的合规情况。
Child Obes. 2016 Aug;12(4):237-46. doi: 10.1089/chi.2015.0223. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
6
Maximizing children's physical activity using the LET US Play principles.运用“让我们动起来”原则,最大限度地增加儿童的身体活动量。
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76:14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
7
Physical activity opportunities in afterschool programs.课后活动项目中的体育活动机会。
Health Promot Pract. 2015 May;16(3):371-82. doi: 10.1177/1524839914567740. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
8
Association of environment and policy characteristics on children's moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and time spent sedentary in afterschool programs.校外活动项目中环境与政策特征对儿童中高强度身体活动及久坐时间的影响
Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69 Suppl 1:S49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
9
Impact of physical activity intervention programs on self-efficacy in youths: a systematic review.体育活动干预计划对青少年自我效能的影响:一项系统评价
ISRN Obes. 2013 Feb 7;2013:586497. doi: 10.1155/2013/586497. eCollection 2013.
10
The contribution of school breaks to the all-day physical activity of 9- and 10-year-old overweight and non-overweight children.学校课间休息对 9 至 10 岁超重和非超重儿童全天身体活动的贡献。
Int J Public Health. 2012 Aug;57(4):711-8. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0355-z. Epub 2012 Mar 14.