Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Psychology, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Scand J Psychol. 2021 Jun;62(3):355-364. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12708. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
Traditional board games are a common social activity for many children, but little is known about the behavioral effects of this type of game. The current study aims to explore the behavioral effects of cooperative and competitive board games in four-to-six-year-old children (N = 65). Repeatedly during 6 weeks, children in groups of four played either cooperative or competitive board games in a between-subject design, and shortly after each game conducted a task in which children's cooperative, prosocial, competitive, and antisocial behavior were observed. The type of board game did not have an effect on cooperative, prosocial or antisocial behavior. Cooperative and competitive board games elicited equal amounts of cooperative and prosocial behavior, which suggest that board games, regardless of type, could have positive effects on preschoolers' social behavior. Our results suggest that children may compete more after playing competitive board games; but the measure of competitive behavior in particular was unreliable. Preschoolers enjoyed playing cooperative board games more than competitive board games, which may be one reason to prefer their use.
传统棋盘游戏是许多儿童常见的社交活动,但对于这种类型的游戏对行为的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在探索合作和竞争棋盘游戏对四到六岁儿童(N=65)的行为影响。在 6 周的时间里,孩子们以四人一组的形式进行了多次分组实验,参与者分别进行合作或竞争棋盘游戏,在每次游戏结束后不久,让孩子们参与一个任务,观察他们的合作、亲社会、竞争和反社会行为。棋盘游戏的类型对合作、亲社会或反社会行为没有影响。合作和竞争的棋盘游戏都引发了相同数量的合作和亲社会行为,这表明棋盘游戏无论类型如何,都可能对学龄前儿童的社会行为产生积极影响。我们的结果表明,儿童在玩完竞争性棋盘游戏后可能会更具竞争性;但竞争行为的测量特别不可靠。学龄前儿童更喜欢玩合作性的棋盘游戏,而不是竞争性的棋盘游戏,这可能是更喜欢使用合作性棋盘游戏的一个原因。