Anaesthesiology Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, P-77, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Oct;105(4):466-70. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq170. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
A recent heat-balance study in volunteers suggested that greater efficacy of circulating-water garments (CWGs) results largely from increased heat transfer across the posterior skin surface since heat transfer across the anterior skin surface was similar with circulating-water and forced-air. We thus tested the hypothesis that the combination of a circulating-water mattress (CWM) and forced-air warming prevents core temperature reduction during major abdominal surgery no worse than a CWG does.
Fifty adult patients aged between 18 and 85 yr old, undergoing major abdominal surgery, were randomly assigned to intraoperative warming with a combination of forced-air and a CWM or with a CWG (Allon ThermoWrap). Core temperature was measured in the distal oesophagus. Non-inferiority of the CWM to the CWG on change from baseline to median intraoperative temperature was assessed using a one-tailed Student's t-test with an equivalency buffer of -0.5°C.
Data analysis was restricted to 16 CWG and 20 CWM patients who completed the protocol. Core temperature increased in both groups during the initial hours of surgery. We had sufficient evidence (P=0.001), to conclude that the combination of a CWM and forced-air warming was non-inferior to a CWG in preventing temperature reduction, with mean (95% CI) difference in the temperature change between the CWM and the CWG groups (CWM-CWG) of 0.46°C (-0.09°C, 1.00°C).
The combination of a CWM and forced-air warming is significantly non-inferior in maintaining intraoperative core temperature than a CWG.
This trial has been registered at clinical trials.gov, identifier: NCT 00651898.
最近一项志愿者的热量平衡研究表明,循环水服装(CWG)的更高功效主要来自于后皮肤表面的热量传递增加,因为前皮肤表面的热量传递与循环水和强制空气相似。因此,我们测试了这样一个假设,即循环水床垫(CWM)和强制空气加热的组合在进行大腹部手术期间防止核心体温下降的效果不会比 CWG 差。
50 名年龄在 18 至 85 岁之间的成年患者,接受大腹部手术,随机分配到术中使用强制空气和 CWM 的组合或 CWG(Allon ThermoWrap)进行加热。在远端食管测量核心温度。使用单侧学生 t 检验评估 CWM 与 CWG 从基线到术中中位数温度变化的非劣效性,等效缓冲区为 -0.5°C。
数据分析仅限于完成方案的 16 名 CWG 和 20 名 CWM 患者。两组患者在手术初始数小时内核心体温均升高。我们有足够的证据(P=0.001)得出结论,CWM 与强制空气加热的组合在防止体温下降方面与 CWG 一样有效,CWM 与 CWG 组之间温度变化的平均(95%CI)差异为 0.46°C(-0.09°C,1.00°C)。
CWM 与强制空气加热的组合在维持术中核心体温方面明显优于 CWG。
该试验已在临床试验.gov 注册,标识符:NCT 00651898。