• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[病态窦房结综合征患者心房起搏时一度房室传导阻滞的风险]

[Risk of the first degree atrioventricular block during atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome].

作者信息

Szczechowicz Marcin, Wilczek Urszula, Lelakowski Jacek

机构信息

Koło Naukowe przy Klinice Elektrokardiologii, Instytutu Kardiologii CMUJ w Krakowie.

出版信息

Przegl Lek. 2010;67(3):157-60.

PMID:20687375
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Permanent cardiac pacing is applied in symptomatic cases of sick sinus syndrome (SSS). The aim of our research was to characterize a group of patients suffering from SSS with low risk of developing into the first degree atrioventricular block (AVB), who are able to have the atrial pacemaker (AAI) implanted.

METHODS

243 patients (mean aged 61.8 years, 22.7-90.3) with implanted AAI pacemaker due to SSS were qualified. The PQ interval was compared in the earliest found (1-119 months from implantation, SD +/- 2.7 m) and the last control examination of each patient. Mean follow-up time was 88,8 months. We took into consideration the age at the moment of implantation, basic rhythm rate, polarity of the stimulating electrode (unipolar/bipolar), and presence or absence of "rate response" option.

RESULTS

During the follow-up the PQ interval prolonged in 40.4% of patients, on average by 36 ms, did not change in 42.1%, and in 17.5% contracted, on average by 30 ms. The age differences of these groups were not statistically significant. Prolongation of PQ in atrial pacing was rather sudden than linear, below the certain age changes of PQ are slight and after going beyond this age it increases visibly. In our patients this crucial age is 60-70. Presence of "rate response", polarity of the stimulating electrode, basic rhythm rate did not have any influence on PQ changes. The 1st degree AVB has been developed almost in a half of our group of patients. They had longer, almost border PQ in the first examination (mean 196 ms, SD +/- 29 vs. 166 ms, SD +/- 24; p < 0.001). During on average 63 months long observation the PQ interval became longer on average by next 23 ms. In the rest of patients, during the comparable time period PQ did not change. The differences of PQ changes between these groups were strongly statistically significant (p < 0.001). The 1st degree AVB occurred in 20% of patients with initial PQ < or = 160 ms and in 53% of patients with longer PQ.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. The 1st degree AVB in the group of patients in 7th-8th decade of their lives, regardless of patients' sex, treated with permanent AAI pacing, develops usually when PQ reaches the upper borderline of standard range in the examination at the starting point. 2. In people with initially short PQ interval (< or = 160 ms) there is low risk of the 1st degree AVB.
摘要

背景

永久性心脏起搏用于病态窦房结综合征(SSS)的症状性病例。我们研究的目的是确定一组患SSS且发展为一度房室传导阻滞(AVB)风险较低、能够植入心房起搏器(AAI)的患者。

方法

纳入243例因SSS植入AAI起搏器的患者(平均年龄61.8岁,22.7 - 90.3岁)。比较每位患者最早一次(植入后1 - 119个月,标准差±2.7个月)和最后一次对照检查时的PQ间期。平均随访时间为88.8个月。我们考虑了植入时的年龄、基础心律、刺激电极的极性(单极/双极)以及是否存在“频率应答”功能。

结果

随访期间,40.4%的患者PQ间期延长,平均延长36毫秒;42.1%的患者PQ间期无变化;17.5%的患者PQ间期缩短,平均缩短30毫秒。这些组间的年龄差异无统计学意义。心房起搏时PQ间期延长较为突然而非呈线性,低于特定年龄时PQ变化轻微,超过该年龄后则明显增加。在我们的患者中,这个关键年龄为60 - 70岁。“频率应答”功能的存在、刺激电极的极性、基础心律对PQ变化均无影响。我们组近一半的患者发生了一度AVB。他们在首次检查时PQ间期较长,几乎达到临界值(平均196毫秒,标准差±29 vs. 166毫秒,标准差±24;p < 0.001)。在平均63个月的观察期内,PQ间期平均又延长了23毫秒。在其余患者中,在可比时间段内PQ间期无变化。这些组间PQ变化的差异具有高度统计学意义(p < 0.001)。初始PQ≤160毫秒的患者中,20%发生了一度AVB,而PQ较长的患者中这一比例为53%。

结论

  1. 70 - 80岁接受永久性AAI起搏治疗的患者组中,无论性别,一度AVB通常在起始检查时PQ达到标准范围上限临界值时发生。2. 初始PQ间期较短(≤160毫秒)的患者发生一度AVB的风险较低。

相似文献

1
[Risk of the first degree atrioventricular block during atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome].[病态窦房结综合征患者心房起搏时一度房室传导阻滞的风险]
Przegl Lek. 2010;67(3):157-60.
2
Long-term reliability of AAI mode pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction and low Wenckebach block rate.窦房结功能障碍且文氏阻滞率低的患者采用AAI模式起搏的长期可靠性
Europace. 2008 Feb;10(2):134-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum290. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
3
Electrophysiological determinants of atrial fibrillation in sinus node dysfunction despite atrial pacing.尽管进行了心房起搏,窦房结功能障碍时心房颤动的电生理决定因素。
Europace. 2000 Oct;2(4):304-11. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0118.
4
Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias.有症状的无相关快速心律失常的窦房结功能不全患者中房性起搏与VVI起搏模式的比较。
Indian Heart J. 1990 May-Jun;42(3):143-7.
5
Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.病态窦房结综合征患者AAI起搏的长期临床疗效:与双腔起搏的比较。
Europace. 2004 Sep;6(5):444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.05.003.
6
[Pacemaker therapy for the sick sinus node syndrome. Does the atrially involved pacemaker system lower the frequency of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic complications as well as mortality?].[病窦综合征的起搏器治疗。心房参与的起搏器系统是否能降低心房颤动、血栓栓塞并发症的发生率以及死亡率?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1994 Dec 9;119(49):1683-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1058887.
7
Changes in the mental and physical components of the quality of life for patients six months after pacemaker implantation.起搏器植入六个月后患者生活质量的心理和身体组成部分的变化。
Cardiol J. 2009;16(3):250-3.
8
[Dynamic electrophysiological examination of heart in patients with sick sinus syndrome in continuous pacing].[病态窦房结综合征患者连续起搏时心脏的动态电生理检查]
Ter Arkh. 1998;70(4):24-7.
9
[Progression to 2d and 3d grade atrioventricular block in patients after electrostimulation for bundle-branch block and syncope: a long-term study].[束支传导阻滞和晕厥患者电刺激后进展为二度和三度房室传导阻滞:一项长期研究]
G Ital Cardiol. 1994 Apr;24(4):409-16.
10
[Atrial fibrillation before and after pacemaker implantation (WI and DDD) in patients with complete atrioventricular block].[完全性房室传导阻滞患者起搏器植入(WI和DDD)前后的心房颤动]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2010 May;28(167):345-9.