• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

窦房结功能障碍且文氏阻滞率低的患者采用AAI模式起搏的长期可靠性

Long-term reliability of AAI mode pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction and low Wenckebach block rate.

作者信息

Adachi Masamitsu, Igawa Osamu, Yano Akio, Miake Junichiro, Inoue Yoshiaki, Ogura Kazuyoshi, Kato Masaru, Iitsuka Kazuhiko, Hisatome Ichiro

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tottori University Hospital, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago 683-8504, Japan.

出版信息

Europace. 2008 Feb;10(2):134-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum290. Epub 2008 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1093/europace/eum290
PMID:18199569
Abstract

AIMS

To compare the risk of atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbance between patients with sinus node dysfunction on AAI pacing who had a low or high Wenckebach block rate (WBR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with sinus node dysfunction and normal AV conduction those underwent an electrophysiological study were studied. The patients were classified into two groups: Group L was with the patients with a WBR of 100 to 129 per minute and Group H was with the patients with a WBR > or = 130 per minute. All patients followed up every 3-6 months after an AAI pacemaker implantation. A total of 102 patients, including 35 Group L and 67 Group H, were followed for 90 +/- 44 months. Six patients died from non-cardiac cause and five patients required a new atrial lead implantation due to lead failure during follow-up. Symptomatic bradycardia requiring a new ventricular lead implantation developed in four patients (annual incidence 0.5%). In Group L, two patients developed AV block (annual incidence 0.7%). In Group H, two patients developed bradycardic atrial fibrillation (annual incidence 0.4%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.2983).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that a long-term risk of developing AV conduction disturbance is low even in patients with a WBR of 100 to 129 per minute.

摘要

目的

比较在AAI起搏治疗的窦房结功能障碍患者中,Wenckebach阻滞率(WBR)低或高的患者发生房室传导障碍的风险。

方法与结果

对接受电生理研究的窦房结功能障碍且房室传导正常的患者进行研究。患者被分为两组:L组为WBR为每分钟100至129次的患者,H组为WBR≥130次/分钟的患者。所有患者在植入AAI起搏器后每3至6个月进行一次随访。共有102例患者,包括35例L组患者和67例H组患者,随访90±44个月。6例患者死于非心脏原因,5例患者因随访期间导线故障需要植入新的心房导线。4例患者出现需要植入新的心室导线的症状性心动过缓(年发生率0.5%)。L组有2例患者发生房室传导阻滞(年发生率0.7%)。H组有2例患者发生缓慢性心房颤动(年发生率0.4%)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示两组之间无显著差异(P = 0.2983)。

结论

这些结果表明,即使是WBR为每分钟100至129次的患者,发生房室传导障碍的长期风险也较低。

相似文献

1
Long-term reliability of AAI mode pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction and low Wenckebach block rate.窦房结功能障碍且文氏阻滞率低的患者采用AAI模式起搏的长期可靠性
Europace. 2008 Feb;10(2):134-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum290. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
2
Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.病态窦房结综合征患者AAI起搏的长期临床疗效:与双腔起搏的比较。
Europace. 2004 Sep;6(5):444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.05.003.
3
Electrophysiological determinants of atrial fibrillation in sinus node dysfunction despite atrial pacing.尽管进行了心房起搏,窦房结功能障碍时心房颤动的电生理决定因素。
Europace. 2000 Oct;2(4):304-11. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0118.
4
Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias.有症状的无相关快速心律失常的窦房结功能不全患者中房性起搏与VVI起搏模式的比较。
Indian Heart J. 1990 May-Jun;42(3):143-7.
5
[Risk of the first degree atrioventricular block during atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome].[病态窦房结综合征患者心房起搏时一度房室传导阻滞的风险]
Przegl Lek. 2010;67(3):157-60.
6
Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block.在患有窦房结疾病和房室传导阻滞的患者中,采用心室管理起搏模式减少不必要的右心室起搏。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Jul;29(7):697-705. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00422.x.
7
Single chamber atrial pacing: a realistic option in sinus node disease: a long-term follow-up study of 213 patients.单腔心房起搏:窦房结疾病的一种现实选择:对213例患者的长期随访研究
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Jun;30(6):740-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00744.x.
8
[Permanent atrial stimulation (AAI) in the sick sinus syndrome].[病态窦房结综合征中的永久性心房起搏(AAI)]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 1990;43 Suppl 2:52-7.
9
The relationship between right ventricular pacing and atrial fibrillation burden and disease progression in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the long-MinVPACE study.阵发性心房颤动患者右心室起搏与房颤负荷和疾病进展的关系:长 MinVPACE 研究。
Europace. 2011 Jun;13(6):815-20. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq463. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
10
Atrial pacing should be used more frequently in sinus node disease.心房起搏在窦房结疾病中应更频繁地使用。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Apr;28(4):291-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.08672.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Iatrogenic pacemaker-induced ventricular arrhythmia: a case report.医源性起搏器诱发的室性心律失常:一例报告。
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2022 May 3;6(5):ytac189. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac189. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Current concepts in pacing 2010-2011: the right and wrong way to pace.2010 - 2011年起搏领域的当前概念:正确与错误的起搏方式
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2011 Oct;13(5):370-84. doi: 10.1007/s11936-011-0137-6.
3
[Maintenance of AAI(R) mode at the time of generator replacement].[更换发生器时AAI(R)模式的维持]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2010 Sep;21(3):196-9. doi: 10.1007/s00399-010-0104-z.