• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有症状的无相关快速心律失常的窦房结功能不全患者中房性起搏与VVI起搏模式的比较。

Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias.

作者信息

Sethi K K, Bajaj V, Mohan J C, Arora R, Khalilullah M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, G.B. Pant Hospital, New Delhi.

出版信息

Indian Heart J. 1990 May-Jun;42(3):143-7.

PMID:2258196
Abstract

The natural course of patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunction who did not have associated tachyarrhythmias before pacemaker implantation was compared after VVI and atrial pacemaker implantation. Between April 1981 and June 1989, forty-seven such patients (mean age 52 + 13 years) received VVI pacemakers and forty patients (mean age 54 + 13 years) received AAI or DDD pacemakers. Baseline clinical characteristics and severity of sinus node dysfunction were comparable in the two groups. Over a follow up of 10 to 96 months (mean 49.2 + 26 months), 11 (23.4%) VVI patients were in functional class II or more compared to 2 (5%) atrially paced patients (p less than 0.01). Other complication rates were also higher in the VVI group as compared to AAI group viz. atrial fibrillation (21.2% vs 2.5% p less than 0.01) and stroke (10.6% vs 2.5%) though the number of deaths (14.9% vs 10%) was not significantly different in the two groups. Two patients in atrial paced group and one patient in VVI group developed first degree heart block. There was no incidence of second or third degree heart block. Transient loss of atrial sensing occurred in 3 patients and atrial lead displacement in 2 cases, but overall incidence of lead related problems was low and comparable in both groups. Thus atrial pacing is superior to ventricular pacing in sinus node dysfunction and risk of developing high grade atrioventricular block on follow up is low.

摘要

在植入VVI起搏器和心房起搏器后,对起搏器植入前无相关快速心律失常的有症状窦房结功能障碍患者的自然病程进行了比较。1981年4月至1989年6月期间,47例此类患者(平均年龄52±13岁)接受了VVI起搏器,40例患者(平均年龄54±13岁)接受了AAI或DDD起搏器。两组的基线临床特征和窦房结功能障碍的严重程度相当。在10至96个月(平均49.2±26个月)的随访中,11例(23.4%)VVI患者的功能分级为II级或更高,而心房起搏患者为2例(5%)(p<0.01)。与AAI组相比,VVI组的其他并发症发生率也更高,即房颤(21.2%对2.5%,p<0.01)和中风(10.6%对2.5%),尽管两组的死亡人数(14.9%对10%)没有显著差异。心房起搏组有2例患者和VVI组有1例患者发生一度房室传导阻滞。没有二度或三度房室传导阻滞的发生。3例患者出现短暂性心房感知丧失,2例出现心房导线移位,但两组导线相关问题的总体发生率较低且相当。因此,在窦房结功能障碍中,心房起搏优于心室起搏,随访中发生高度房室传导阻滞的风险较低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias.有症状的无相关快速心律失常的窦房结功能不全患者中房性起搏与VVI起搏模式的比较。
Indian Heart J. 1990 May-Jun;42(3):143-7.
2
[Pacemaker therapy for the sick sinus node syndrome. Does the atrially involved pacemaker system lower the frequency of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic complications as well as mortality?].[病窦综合征的起搏器治疗。心房参与的起搏器系统是否能降低心房颤动、血栓栓塞并发症的发生率以及死亡率?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1994 Dec 9;119(49):1683-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1058887.
3
Electrophysiological determinants of atrial fibrillation in sinus node dysfunction despite atrial pacing.尽管进行了心房起搏,窦房结功能障碍时心房颤动的电生理决定因素。
Europace. 2000 Oct;2(4):304-11. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0118.
4
Atrial pacing should be used more frequently in sinus node disease.心房起搏在窦房结疾病中应更频繁地使用。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Apr;28(4):291-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.08672.x.
5
[Comparative effects of atrial and ventricular stimulation on morbidity and mortality in patients with sinus node disease].
Cardiologia. 1990 Jun;35(6):499-502.
6
Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.病态窦房结综合征患者AAI起搏的长期临床疗效:与双腔起搏的比较。
Europace. 2004 Sep;6(5):444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.05.003.
7
Long-term reliability of AAI mode pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction and low Wenckebach block rate.窦房结功能障碍且文氏阻滞率低的患者采用AAI模式起搏的长期可靠性
Europace. 2008 Feb;10(2):134-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum290. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
8
[Clinical significance of corrected sinus node recovery time and natural and unnatural history of sinus node dysfunctions. A four-year prospective follow-up of 101 cases].[校正窦房结恢复时间的临床意义及窦房结功能障碍的自然和非自然病史。对101例患者进行的四年前瞻性随访]
G Ital Cardiol. 1982;12(8):563-74.
9
Single chamber atrial pacing: a realistic option in sinus node disease: a long-term follow-up study of 213 patients.单腔心房起搏:窦房结疾病的一种现实选择:对213例患者的长期随访研究
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Jun;30(6):740-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00744.x.
10
[Risk of the first degree atrioventricular block during atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome].[病态窦房结综合征患者心房起搏时一度房室传导阻滞的风险]
Przegl Lek. 2010;67(3):157-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Arterial thromboembolism in patients with sick sinus syndrome: prediction from pacing mode, atrial fibrillation, and echocardiographic findings.病态窦房结综合征患者的动脉血栓栓塞:根据起搏模式、心房颤动及超声心动图检查结果进行预测
Heart. 1999 Apr;81(4):412-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.81.4.412.