• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何进行(或不进行)......一项受益归属分析。

How to do (or not to do) ... a benefit incidence analysis.

机构信息

Health Economics Unit, Department of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Health Sciences Faculty, Observatory, South Africa.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2011 Mar;26(2):174-82. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq031. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/czq031
PMID:20688764
Abstract

Benefit incidence analysis (BIA) considers who (in terms of socio-economic groups) receive what benefit from using health services. While traditionally BIA has focused on only publicly funded health services, to assess whether or not public subsidies are 'pro-poor', the same methodological approach can be used to assess how well the overall health system is performing in terms of the distribution of service benefits. This is becoming increasingly important in the context of the growing emphasis on promoting universal health systems. To conduct a BIA, a household survey dataset that incorporates both information on health service utilization and some measure of socio-economic status is required. The other core data requirement is unit costs of different types of health service. When utilization rates are combined with unit costs for different health services, the distribution of benefits from using services, expressed in monetary terms, can be estimated and compared with the distribution of the need for health care. This paper aims to provide an introduction to the methods used in the 'traditional' public sector BIA, and how the same methods can be applied to undertake an assessment of the whole health system. We consider what data are required, potential sources of data, deficiencies in data frequently available in low- and middle-income countries, and how these data should be analysed.

摘要

受益归属分析(BIA)考虑的是使用卫生服务的人群(按社会经济群体划分)从中获得了哪些收益。传统上,BIA 主要关注的是公共资金资助的卫生服务,为了评估公共补贴是否“有利于穷人”,可以采用相同的方法来评估整个卫生系统在服务效益分配方面的表现。在越来越强调促进全民健康系统的背景下,这一点变得越来越重要。要进行 BIA,需要一个包含卫生服务利用信息和某种社会经济地位衡量标准的家庭调查数据集。另一个核心数据要求是不同类型卫生服务的单位成本。当利用率与不同卫生服务的单位成本相结合时,可以估算服务使用带来的收益分布(以货币形式表示),并将其与卫生保健需求的分布进行比较。本文旨在介绍“传统”公共部门 BIA 中使用的方法,以及如何应用相同的方法对整个卫生系统进行评估。我们考虑了所需的数据、数据的潜在来源、在中低收入国家中经常缺乏的数据的缺陷,以及应该如何分析这些数据。

相似文献

1
How to do (or not to do) ... a benefit incidence analysis.如何进行(或不进行)......一项受益归属分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Mar;26(2):174-82. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq031. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
2
Benefit-incidence analysis: are government health expenditures more pro-rich than we think?受益-发病率分析:政府卫生支出比我们想象的更有利于富人吗?
Health Econ. 2012 Apr;21(4):351-66. doi: 10.1002/hec.1727. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
3
Benefit-incidence analysis of government spending on Ministry of Health outpatient services in Jordan.约旦卫生部门诊服务政府支出的受益-发病率分析。
East Mediterr Health J. 2010 May;16(5):467-73.
4
Health economics in developing countries.发展中国家的卫生经济学
J Trop Med Hyg. 1989 Aug;92(4):229-41.
5
Equity and efficiency in health status and health services utilization: a household perspective.健康状况与卫生服务利用中的公平性与效率:基于家庭视角
Pak Dev Rev. 1991 Winter;30(4 Pt 1):415-31.
6
What are the economic consequences for households of illness and of paying for health care in low- and middle-income country contexts?在低收入和中等收入国家的背景下,疾病以及支付医疗保健费用会给家庭带来哪些经济后果?
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(4):858-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.001. Epub 2005 Aug 15.
7
Who pays and who benefits from health care? An assessment of equity in health care financing and benefit distribution in Tanzania.谁为医疗保健付费,谁从中受益?坦桑尼亚医疗保健筹资和效益分配公平性评估。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Mar;27 Suppl 1:i23-34. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs018.
8
Financing of pediatric home health care. Committee on Child Health Financing, Section on Home Care, American Academy of Pediatrics.儿科家庭医疗保健的融资。美国儿科学会家庭医疗保健分会儿童健康融资委员会。
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):834-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1489.
9
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.公共资助的避孕服务对意外怀孕的影响及其对医疗补助支出的意义。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95.
10
Is there equity in oral healthcare utilization: experience after achieving Universal Coverage.口腔保健利用方面存在公平性吗:全民覆盖后的经验。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;37(1):85-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2008.00449.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Who benefits from the donor-supported malaria programme in Enugu State, Nigeria? A benefit incidence analysis.尼日利亚埃努古州由捐赠者支持的疟疾项目使谁受益?受益发生率分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Mar 13;5(3):e0004286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004286. eCollection 2025.
2
Reducing fragmentation of primary healthcare financing for more equitable, people-centred primary healthcare.减少初级医疗保健融资的碎片化,以实现更公平、以人为本的初级医疗保健。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jan 14;10(1):e015088. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015088.
3
Benefit equity of social health insurance in China and its provinces (2014-2020): implications for universal health coverage.
中国及其省份社会医疗保险的受益公平性(2014-2020 年):对全民健康覆盖的启示。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Nov 4;9(11):e014806. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014806.
4
Which socio-economic groups benefit most from public health expenditure in Senegal? A dynamic benefit incidence analysis.塞内加尔哪些社会经济群体从公共卫生支出中受益最多?动态受益归宿分析。
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Oct 3;28:101714. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101714. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
The financial burden of noncommunicable diseases from out-of-pocket expenditure in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区非传染性疾病自付费用的经济负担:一项范围综述
Health Promot Int. 2024 Oct 1;39(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae114.
6
Cost-effectiveness of a complex continuum of care intervention targeting women and children: protocol for an economic evaluation of the Bukhali trial in South Africa.针对妇女和儿童的复杂连续护理干预措施的成本效益:对南非 Bukhali 试验的经济评价的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 13;14(5):e080166. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080166.
7
Are institutional deliveries equitable in the southern states of India? A benefit incidence analysis.印度南部邦的机构分娩公平吗?一项受益情况分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Jan 30;23(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02097-4.
8
The redistributive effect of the public health system: the case of Sierra Leone.公共卫生系统的再分配效应:以塞拉利昂为例。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Jan 9;39(1):4-21. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad100.
9
Equity assessment of maternal and child healthcare benefits utilization and distribution in public healthcare facilities in Bangladesh: a benefit incidence analysis.孟加拉国公立医疗机构母婴保健福利利用和分配的公平性评估:受益情况分析。
Popul Health Metr. 2023 Sep 5;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12963-023-00312-y.
10
Is socioeconomic inequality in antenatal care coverage widening or reducing between- and within-socioeconomic groups? A case of 19 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲19个国家的产前护理覆盖率在社会经济群体之间和群体内部的社会经济不平等是在扩大还是在缩小?
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Apr 12;23:101402. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101402. eCollection 2023 Sep.