• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

约旦卫生部门诊服务政府支出的受益-发病率分析。

Benefit-incidence analysis of government spending on Ministry of Health outpatient services in Jordan.

机构信息

Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

East Mediterr Health J. 2010 May;16(5):467-73.

PMID:20799544
Abstract

A benefit-incidence analysis was conducted for the year 2000 using various data sources including the Jordan healthcare utilization and expenditure survey 2000. The results illustrate that the poorest segment of the Jordanian population were the most likely to report sickness and seek treatment and were the main users of the Ministry of Health outpatient services. The poorest uninsured individuals were the main source of revenues generated through user fees. The targeting efficiency (i.e. total percentage of benefits received) for the poorest quintile was 33.8% compared with 4.0% in the richest quintile. The analysis demonstrates that the Jordanian government in-kind subsidy is reaching the poor.

摘要

利用包括 2000 年约旦医疗保健利用和支出调查在内的各种数据源,对 2000 年进行了受益-分配分析。结果表明,约旦人口中最贫困的阶层最有可能报告患病并寻求治疗,也是卫生部门诊服务的主要使用者。最贫困的无保险个人是通过用户付费产生的收入的主要来源。最贫困的五分之一人群的目标效率(即受益的总百分比)为 33.8%,而最富裕的五分之一人群为 4.0%。该分析表明,约旦政府的实物补贴正在惠及穷人。

相似文献

1
Benefit-incidence analysis of government spending on Ministry of Health outpatient services in Jordan.约旦卫生部门诊服务政府支出的受益-发病率分析。
East Mediterr Health J. 2010 May;16(5):467-73.
2
Health insurance and treatment seeking behaviour: evidence from a low-income country.健康保险与就医行为:来自低收入国家的证据。
Health Econ. 2004 Sep;13(9):845-57. doi: 10.1002/hec.862.
3
Factors determining choice of health care provider in Jordan.约旦选择医疗服务提供者的决定因素。
East Mediterr Health J. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(4):959-68.
4
Being uninsured in 1996 compared to 1987: how has the experience of the uninsured changed over time?与1987年相比,1996年未参保的情况:未参保者的经历随时间发生了怎样的变化?
Health Serv Res. 2001 Dec;36(6 Pt 2):16-31.
5
How to do (or not to do) ... a benefit incidence analysis.如何进行(或不进行)......一项受益归属分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Mar;26(2):174-82. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq031. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
6
Medical expenditure and rural impoverishment in China.中国的医疗支出与农村贫困问题
J Health Popul Nutr. 2003 Sep;21(3):216-22.
7
Workers who decline employment-related health insurance.拒绝参加与工作相关的健康保险的员工。
Med Care. 2006 May;44(5 Suppl):I12-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000208168.01349.f3.
8
Uninsured status and out-of-pocket costs at midlife.中年时的未参保状态与自付费用
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):911-32.
9
Social risk management options for medical care in Indonesia.印度尼西亚医疗保健的社会风险管理选项。
Health Econ. 2002 Jul;11(5):431-46. doi: 10.1002/hec.689.
10
An analysis of equity in Brazilian health system financing.巴西卫生系统融资中的公平性分析。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jul-Aug;26(4):1017-28. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.1017.

引用本文的文献

1
Are institutional deliveries equitable in the southern states of India? A benefit incidence analysis.印度南部邦的机构分娩公平吗?一项受益情况分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Jan 30;23(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02097-4.
2
Equity assessment of maternal and child healthcare benefits utilization and distribution in public healthcare facilities in Bangladesh: a benefit incidence analysis.孟加拉国公立医疗机构母婴保健福利利用和分配的公平性评估:受益情况分析。
Popul Health Metr. 2023 Sep 5;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12963-023-00312-y.
3
Equity in distribution of public subsidy for noncommunicable diseases among the elderly in India: an application of benefit incidence analysis.
印度老年人非传染性疾病公共补贴分配中的公平性:受益归属分析的应用。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 26;19(1):1735. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8089-y.
4
Benefit incidence analysis in public health facilities in India: utilization and benefits at the national and state levels.印度公共卫生机构的受益情况分析:国家和邦层面的利用情况和受益情况。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 21;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0921-6.
5
Estimating benefit equity of government health subsidy in healthcare Services in Shandong Province, China: a cross-sectional study.评估中国山东省医疗服务中政府卫生补贴的效益公平性:一项横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 May 18;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0775-3.
6
Has equity in government subsidy on healthcare improved in China? Evidence from the China's National Health Services Survey.中国政府医疗补贴的公平性有所改善吗?来自中国国家卫生服务调查的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 10;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0516-z.
7
Equity in Health Care Financing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Evidence from Studies Using Benefit and Financing Incidence Analyses.低收入和中等收入国家医疗保健筹资公平性:对使用受益和筹资发生率分析的研究证据的系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 11;11(4):e0152866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152866. eCollection 2016.
8
Assessing equity in benefit distribution of government health subsidy in 2012 across East China: benefit incidence analysis.2012年中国东部地区政府卫生补贴效益分配公平性评估:效益发生率分析
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jan 20;15:15. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0306-z.
9
Who benefits from government healthcare subsidies? An assessment of the equity of healthcare benefits distribution in China.谁从政府医疗补贴中受益?对中国医疗福利分配公平性的评估。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 17;10(3):e0119840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119840. eCollection 2015.
10
Inequity in hospitalization care: a study on utilization of healthcare services in West Bengal, India.不平等的住院护理:印度西孟加拉邦医疗服务利用情况研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Dec 22;4(1):29-38. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.05. eCollection 2015 Jan.