Suppr超能文献

绘制美国政府烟草控制领导层图谱:成功的网络关系?

Mapping U.S. government tobacco control leadership: networked for success?

机构信息

Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, PO Box 245024, Tucson, AZ 85724-5024, USA.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Sep;12(9):888-94. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq112. Epub 2010 Aug 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In order to better understand how tobacco control efforts are coordinated across agencies of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), we assessed tobacco control-related communication between tobacco control leaders across DHHS.

METHODS

Cross-sectional surveys were collected from individuals representing 11 DHHS agencies, and social network analyses were used to assess linkages and map agencies' tobacco control communication.

RESULTS

Individuals within the Office of the Secretary and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were most central to the network, and those of highest rank were most likely to be central to the network (F = 4.03, p = .024). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Food and Drug Administration, Health Resources and Services Administration, and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration had no or almost no contact with other agencies. There was considerable between-agency contact variability, and the CDC was the most central agency.

DISCUSSION

Tobacco control communication across DHHS agencies was present but extremely variable. This inconsistency may compromise the ability of the DHHS to address tobacco use, a critical public health problem, in a coordinated and efficient fashion. In light of the new leadership at DHHS, this analysis describes a systems approach that can be reimplemented as a means of understanding and improving communication and collaboration to improve public health.

摘要

简介

为了更好地了解卫生与公众服务部(DHHS)各机构之间的烟草控制工作协调情况,我们评估了跨 DHHS 烟草控制负责人之间的烟草控制相关沟通。

方法

从代表 11 个 DHHS 机构的个人中收集了横断面调查,并使用社会网络分析来评估联系并绘制机构的烟草控制沟通图。

结果

书记办公室和疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的个人在网络中最为核心,而职位最高的人最有可能成为网络的核心(F = 4.03,p =.024)。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心、食品和药物管理局、卫生资源和服务管理局以及物质滥用和心理健康服务管理局与其他机构没有或几乎没有联系。各机构之间的联系存在很大的可变性,而 CDC 是最核心的机构。

讨论

DHHS 各机构之间的烟草控制沟通虽然存在,但极其不稳定。这种不一致可能会影响 DHHS 以协调和有效的方式解决烟草使用这一重大公共卫生问题的能力。鉴于 DHHS 的新领导层,本分析描述了一种系统方法,可以重新实施该方法,以了解和改善沟通和协作,从而改善公共卫生。

相似文献

1
Mapping U.S. government tobacco control leadership: networked for success?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Sep;12(9):888-94. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq112. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
3
Assessing state-level active living promotion using network analysis.
J Phys Act Health. 2013 Jan;10(1):19-32. doi: 10.1123/jpah.10.1.19.
4
Interpersonal influence among public health leaders in the United States department of health and human services.
J Public Health Res. 2012 Feb 14;1(1):67-74. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2012.e12. eCollection 2012 Feb 17.
6
Network influences on dissemination of evidence-based guidelines in state tobacco control programs.
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Oct;40(1 Suppl):33S-42S. doi: 10.1177/1090198113492760.
7
Collaboration between local health and local government agencies for health improvement.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15(6):CD007825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007825.pub5.
9
From the sidelines to the frontline: how the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration embraced smoking cessation.
Am J Public Health. 2014 May;104(5):796-802. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301852. Epub 2014 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

4
Multisector Health Policy Networks in 15 Large US Cities.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Nov-Dec;22(6):520-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000401.
5
An Examination of Two Policy Networks Involved in Advancing Smokefree Policy Initiatives.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Sep 8;12(9):11117-31. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120911117.
6
Awareness of Evidence-Based Practices by Organizations in a Publicly Funded Smoking Cessation Network.
J Public Adm Res Theory. 2013;23(1):133-153. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mus011.
7
Interpersonal influence among public health leaders in the United States department of health and human services.
J Public Health Res. 2012 Feb 14;1(1):67-74. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2012.e12. eCollection 2012 Feb 17.
8
Research priorities for FCTC Articles 20, 21, and 22: surveillance/evaluation and information exchange.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Apr;15(4):847-61. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts336. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
9
Mapping tobacco quitlines in North America: signaling pathways to improve treatment.
Am J Public Health. 2012 Nov;102(11):2123-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300529. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Seeing the forest and the trees: using network analysis to develop an organizational blueprint of state tobacco control systems.
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(11):1669-78. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.07.013. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
2
Systems thinking to improve the public's health.
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.014.
3
Using social network analysis to understand Missouri's system of public health emergency planners.
Public Health Rep. 2007 Jul-Aug;122(4):488-98. doi: 10.1177/003335490712200410.
6
Impact of community mental health services on users' social networks. PRiSM Psychosis Study. 7.
Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;173:404-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.173.5.404.
10
Referral patterns to and from inpatient psychiatric services: a social network approach.
Am J Public Health. 1986 Jul;76(7):755-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.7.755.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验