Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, PO Box 245024, Tucson, AZ 85724-5024, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Sep;12(9):888-94. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq112. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
In order to better understand how tobacco control efforts are coordinated across agencies of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), we assessed tobacco control-related communication between tobacco control leaders across DHHS.
Cross-sectional surveys were collected from individuals representing 11 DHHS agencies, and social network analyses were used to assess linkages and map agencies' tobacco control communication.
Individuals within the Office of the Secretary and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were most central to the network, and those of highest rank were most likely to be central to the network (F = 4.03, p = .024). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Food and Drug Administration, Health Resources and Services Administration, and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration had no or almost no contact with other agencies. There was considerable between-agency contact variability, and the CDC was the most central agency.
Tobacco control communication across DHHS agencies was present but extremely variable. This inconsistency may compromise the ability of the DHHS to address tobacco use, a critical public health problem, in a coordinated and efficient fashion. In light of the new leadership at DHHS, this analysis describes a systems approach that can be reimplemented as a means of understanding and improving communication and collaboration to improve public health.
为了更好地了解卫生与公众服务部(DHHS)各机构之间的烟草控制工作协调情况,我们评估了跨 DHHS 烟草控制负责人之间的烟草控制相关沟通。
从代表 11 个 DHHS 机构的个人中收集了横断面调查,并使用社会网络分析来评估联系并绘制机构的烟草控制沟通图。
书记办公室和疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的个人在网络中最为核心,而职位最高的人最有可能成为网络的核心(F = 4.03,p =.024)。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心、食品和药物管理局、卫生资源和服务管理局以及物质滥用和心理健康服务管理局与其他机构没有或几乎没有联系。各机构之间的联系存在很大的可变性,而 CDC 是最核心的机构。
DHHS 各机构之间的烟草控制沟通虽然存在,但极其不稳定。这种不一致可能会影响 DHHS 以协调和有效的方式解决烟草使用这一重大公共卫生问题的能力。鉴于 DHHS 的新领导层,本分析描述了一种系统方法,可以重新实施该方法,以了解和改善沟通和协作,从而改善公共卫生。