• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用网络分析评估州级积极生活促进。

Assessing state-level active living promotion using network analysis.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Studies, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2013 Jan;10(1):19-32. doi: 10.1123/jpah.10.1.19.

DOI:10.1123/jpah.10.1.19
PMID:23324485
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical inactivity is a growing problem in the United States, one that is being addressed through the development of active living communities. However, active living promotion requires collaboration among organizations that may not have previously shared goals.

METHODS

A network analysis was conducted to assess Hawaii's active living promotion network. Twenty-six organizations playing a significant role in promoting active living in Hawaii were identified and surveyed about their frequency of contact, level of collaboration, and funding flow with other agencies.

RESULTS

A communication network was identified linking all agencies. This network had many long pathways, impeding information flow. The Department of Health (DOH) and the State Nutrition and Physical Activity Coalition (NPAC) were central nodes, but DOH connected state agencies while NPAC linked county and voluntary organizations. Within the network, information sharing was common, but collaboration and formal partnership were low. Linkages between county and state agencies, between counties, and between state agencies with different core agendas were particularly low.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that in the early stages of development, active living networks may be divided by geography and core missions, requiring work to bridge these divides. Network mapping appears helpful in identifying areas for network development.

摘要

背景

身体活动不足是美国日益严重的问题,正在通过发展积极生活社区来解决。然而,积极生活的推广需要那些以前没有共同目标的组织之间的合作。

方法

对夏威夷的积极生活推广网络进行了网络分析。确定了 26 个在夏威夷积极生活推广中发挥重要作用的组织,并对其与其他机构的联系频率、合作程度和资金流动情况进行了调查。

结果

确定了一个连接所有机构的通信网络。该网络存在许多长路径,阻碍了信息流。卫生部(DOH)和国家营养与身体活动联盟(NPAC)是中心节点,但 DOH 连接了州级机构,而 NPAC 则连接了县和志愿组织。在网络中,信息共享很常见,但合作和正式伙伴关系很少。县与州级机构之间、县与县之间以及不同核心议程的州级机构之间的联系尤其薄弱。

结论

结果表明,在发展的早期阶段,积极生活网络可能因地理位置和核心使命而分裂,需要努力弥合这些分歧。网络映射似乎有助于确定网络发展的领域。

相似文献

1
Assessing state-level active living promotion using network analysis.利用网络分析评估州级积极生活促进。
J Phys Act Health. 2013 Jan;10(1):19-32. doi: 10.1123/jpah.10.1.19.
2
Interorganizational relationships within state tobacco control networks: a social network analysis.州级烟草控制网络中的组织间关系:一项社会网络分析
Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Oct;1(4):A08. Epub 2004 Sep 15.
3
Network analysis of inter-organizational relationships and policy use among active living organizations in Alberta, Canada.加拿大艾伯塔省活跃生活组织间组织关系和政策使用的网络分析。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 9;17(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4661-5.
4
Mapping U.S. government tobacco control leadership: networked for success?绘制美国政府烟草控制领导层图谱:成功的网络关系?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Sep;12(9):888-94. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq112. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
5
Analysing collaboration among HIV agencies through combining network theory and relational coordination.通过结合网络理论和关系协调来分析艾滋病病毒防治机构之间的合作。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Feb;150:85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
6
Mapping the Possibilities: Using Network Analysis to Identify Opportunities for Building Nutrition Partnerships Within Diverse Low-Income Communities.描绘可能性:利用网络分析确定在不同低收入社区建立营养伙伴关系的机会。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015 Jul-Aug;47(4):300-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
7
Assessing the Network of Agencies in Local Communities that Promote Healthy Eating and Lifestyles among Populations with Limited Resources.评估当地社区中促进资源有限人群健康饮食和生活方式的机构网络。
Am J Health Behav. 2017 Mar 1;41(2):127-138. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.41.2.3.
8
Collaboration between local health and local government agencies for health improvement.地方卫生部门与地方政府机构为改善健康状况而开展的合作。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15(6):CD007825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007825.pub5.
9
Multi-agency, multi-professional work: experiences from a drug prevention project.多机构、多专业合作:一个毒品预防项目的经验
Health Educ Res. 2003 Dec;18(6):717-28. doi: 10.1093/her/cyf058.
10
Community Interagency Connections for Immigrant Worker Health Interventions, King County, Washington State, 2012-2013.华盛顿州金县移民工人健康干预社区跨部门合作,2012 - 2013年
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jun 2;13:E73. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160013.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing mechanisms of interdisciplinary cooperation in promoting students' health at university.分析多学科合作促进大学生健康的机制。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 3;23(1):1911. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16786-2.
2
Systems Thinking and Complexity Science Methods and the Policy Process in Non-communicable Disease Prevention: A Systematic Scoping Review.系统思维和复杂性科学方法与非传染性疾病预防政策过程:系统范围综述。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6772. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6772. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
3
Community networks of sport and physical activity promotion: an analysis of structural properties and conditions of cooperation.
社区体育与体育活动促进网络:结构属性与合作条件分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):1966. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14383-3.
4
Physical activity promotion in an urban district: Analyzing the mechanisms of interorganizational cooperation.促进城市社区的身体活动:分析组织间合作的机制。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 15;16(11):e0260053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260053. eCollection 2021.
5
Interorganizational Networks in Physical Activity Promotion: A Systematic Review.体育活动促进中的组织间网络:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 8;18(14):7306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147306.
6
Promoting Students' Health at University: Key Stakeholders, Cooperation, and Network Development.促进大学生健康:关键利益相关者、合作与网络发展。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 30;9:680714. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.680714. eCollection 2021.
7
Network analysis of inter-organizational relationships and policy use among active living organizations in Alberta, Canada.加拿大艾伯塔省活跃生活组织间组织关系和政策使用的网络分析。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 9;17(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4661-5.
8
Community partnerships in healthy eating and lifestyle promotion: A network analysis.促进健康饮食和生活方式的社区伙伴关系:一项网络分析。
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Mar 24;6:294-301. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.03.007. eCollection 2017 Jun.
9
Characteristics of successful community partnerships to promote physical activity among young people, North Carolina, 2010-2012.2010 - 2012年北卡罗来纳州促进青少年身体活动的成功社区伙伴关系的特征
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Dec 12;10:E208. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.130110.
10
Critical success factors for physical activity promotion through community partnerships.通过社区伙伴关系促进身体活动的关键成功因素。
Int J Public Health. 2014 Feb;59(1):51-60. doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0527-5. Epub 2013 Nov 28.