Provan Keith G, Beagles Jonathan E, Mercken Liesbeth, Leischow Scott J
Eller College of Management and School of Government & Public Policy 1130 E. Helen Street, McClelland Hall University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 (
University of Arizona,
J Public Adm Res Theory. 2013;23(1):133-153. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mus011.
This research examines the awareness of evidence based practices by the public organizations that fund services in the North American Quitline Consortium (NAQC). NAQC is a large, publicly funded, goal-directed "whole network," spanning both Canada and the U.S., working to get people to quit smoking. Building on prior research on the dissemination and diffusion of innovation and evidence based practices, and considering differences between network ties that are homophilous versus instrumental, we found that awareness of evidence based practices was highest for quitline funders that were strongly connected directly to researchers and indirectly to the network administrative organization, controlling for quitline spending per capita and decision making locus of control. The findings support the importance of maintaining instrumental (a technical-rational argument) rather than homophilous ties for acquisition of evidence based practice knowledge. The findings also offer ideas for how public networks might be designed and governed to enhance the likelihood that the organizations in the network are better aware of what evidence based practices exist.
本研究考察了北美戒烟热线联盟(NAQC)中为服务提供资金的公共组织对循证实践的认知情况。NAQC是一个大型的、由公共资金支持的、目标导向型的“全网络”,覆盖加拿大和美国,致力于帮助人们戒烟。基于先前关于创新和循证实践的传播与扩散的研究,并考虑到同质化关系与工具性关系之间的差异,我们发现,在控制人均戒烟热线支出和决策控制点的情况下,与研究人员直接联系紧密且与网络管理组织间接联系紧密的戒烟热线资助者对循证实践的认知最高。研究结果支持了维持工具性(技术理性观点)而非同质化关系对于获取循证实践知识的重要性。研究结果还为公共网络的设计和管理提供了思路,以提高网络中的组织更了解现有循证实践的可能性。