• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雇主支持母乳喂养问卷(ESBQ)的心理计量学评估。

Psychometric evaluation of the Employer Support for Breastfeeding Questionnaire (ESBQ).

机构信息

Graceland University School of Nursing, Independence, Missouri 64050 , USA.

出版信息

J Hum Lact. 2010 Aug;26(3):286-96. doi: 10.1177/0890334410365066.

DOI:10.1177/0890334410365066
PMID:20689104
Abstract

The purpose of this descriptive methodological study was to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Employer's Support for Breastfeeding Questionnaire (ESBQ). The convenience sample consisted of 380 business owners, managers, or supervisors from the Midwestern United States. Data were collected using Web and paper-based questionnaires from January to March 2008. Psychometric evaluation included item analysis, scale reliability, and construct validity. The ESBQ subscales had Cronbach's alphas ranging from 0.85 to 0.92. Most inter-item and item-to-total correlations were above the recommendation of 0.30. The test-retest reliability of each subscale ranged from 0.93 to 1.0. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the construct validity of the scale. The comparative fit index (CFI) and the non-normal fit index (NNFI) were 0.90 and 0.91, respectively, and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.05. Findings supported the ESBQ as reliable, valid, and theoretically consistent with the theory of planned behavior.

摘要

本描述性方法研究旨在开发和评估雇主对母乳喂养支持问卷(ESBQ)的心理计量学特性。方便样本由来自美国中西部的 380 位企业主、经理或主管组成。数据于 2008 年 1 月至 3 月通过网络和纸质问卷收集。心理计量学评估包括项目分析、量表信度和结构有效性。ESBQ 分量表的克朗巴赫α系数范围为 0.85 至 0.92。大多数项目间和项目总分相关系数均高于 0.30 的建议值。每个分量表的重测信度范围为 0.93 至 1.0。验证性因子分析支持量表的结构有效性。比较拟合指数(CFI)和非正态拟合指数(NNFI)分别为 0.90 和 0.91,近似均方根误差(RMSEA)为 0.05。研究结果支持 ESBQ 具有可靠性、有效性,并且在理论上与计划行为理论一致。

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the Employer Support for Breastfeeding Questionnaire (ESBQ).雇主支持母乳喂养问卷(ESBQ)的心理计量学评估。
J Hum Lact. 2010 Aug;26(3):286-96. doi: 10.1177/0890334410365066.
2
Trust in Nurses Scale: construct validity and internal reliability evaluation.信任护士量表:结构效度和内部信度评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Mar;66(3):683-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05168.x.
3
Factor structure of the geriatric care environment scale.老年护理环境量表的因子结构
Nurs Res. 2007 Sep-Oct;56(5):339-47. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000289500.37661.aa.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Organizational Job Satisfaction Scale.组织工作满意度量表的心理测量评估
J Nurs Meas. 1997 Summer;5(1):53-69.
5
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
6
The development and testing of the nursing teamwork survey.护理团队合作调查的开发与测试。
Nurs Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;59(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181c3bd42.
7
[Development of a breast feeding adaptation scale (BFAS)].[母乳喂养适应量表(BFAS)的编制]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2009 Apr;39(2):259-69. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2009.39.2.259.
8
Construct validity and reliability of college students' responses to the reasons for smoking scale.大学生吸烟原因量表反应的构建效度和信度。
J Am Coll Health. 2010 May-Jun;58(6):571-7. doi: 10.1080/07448481003622294.
9
The partner-specific sexual liking and sexual wanting scale: psychometric properties.特定伴侣性喜好和性欲望量表:心理测量学特性。
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Apr;41(2):467-76. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9785-6. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
10
Psychometric evaluation of Self-Assessed Support Needs of women with breast cancer Scale.乳腺癌患者自我评估支持需求量表的心理测量学评价
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Oct;16(10):1927-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01825.x.