Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention Section, Public Health-Seattle and King County, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 Sep-Oct;16(5 Suppl):S11-20. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181ddcbd9.
Subject matter experts systematically reviewed evidence on the effectiveness of housing interventions that affect health outcomes, primarily asthma, associated with exposure to moisture, mold, and allergens. Three of the 11 interventions reviewed had sufficient evidence for implementation: multifaceted, in-home, tailored interventions for reducing asthma morbidity; integrated pest management to reduce cockroach allergen; and combined elimination of moisture intrusion and leaks and removal of moldy items to reduce mold and respiratory symptoms. Four interventions needed more field evaluation, 1 needed formative research, and 3 either had no evidence of effectiveness or were ineffective. The 3 interventions with sufficient evidence all applied multiple, integrated strategies. This evidence review shows that selected interventions that improve housing conditions will reduce morbidity from asthma and respiratory allergies.
主题专家系统地审查了影响与暴露于潮湿、霉菌和过敏原有关的健康结果(主要是哮喘)的住房干预措施的有效性的证据。在审查的 11 项干预措施中,有 3 项有足够的证据可以实施:多方面的、针对家庭的、量身定制的干预措施,以减少哮喘发病率;综合虫害管理以减少蟑螂过敏原;以及消除潮湿入侵和泄漏并清除发霉物品,以减少霉菌和呼吸道症状。4 项干预措施需要更多的现场评估,1 项需要形成性研究,而 3 项要么没有有效性证据,要么无效。这 3 项具有足够证据的干预措施都应用了多种综合策略。这项证据审查表明,改善住房条件的选定干预措施将减少哮喘和呼吸道过敏的发病率。