Center for Public Health and Human Rights, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
PLoS Med. 2010 Aug 3;7(8):e1000317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000317.
Access to essential maternal and reproductive health care is poor throughout Burma, but is particularly lacking among internally displaced communities in the eastern border regions. In such settings, innovative strategies for accessing vulnerable populations and delivering basic public health interventions are urgently needed.
Four ethnic health organizations from the Shan, Mon, Karen, and Karenni regions collaborated on a pilot project between 2005 and 2008 to examine the feasibility of an innovative three-tiered network of community-based providers for delivery of maternal health interventions in the complex emergency setting of eastern Burma. Two-stage cluster-sampling surveys among ever-married women of reproductive age (15-45 y) conducted before and after program implementation enabled evaluation of changes in coverage of essential antenatal care interventions, attendance at birth by those trained to manage complications, postnatal care, and family planning services.
Among 2,889 and 2,442 women of reproductive age in 2006 and 2008, respectively, population characteristics (age, marital status, ethnic distribution, literacy) were similar. Compared to baseline, women whose most recent pregnancy occurred during the implementation period were substantially more likely to receive antenatal care (71.8% versus 39.3%, prevalence rate ratio [PRR] = 1.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64-2.04]) and specific interventions such as urine testing (42.4% versus 15.7%, PRR = 2.69 [95% CI 2.69-3.54]), malaria screening (55.9% versus 21.9%, PRR = 2.88 [95% CI 2.15-3.85]), and deworming (58.2% versus 4.1%, PRR = 14.18 [95% CI 10.76-18.71]. Postnatal care visits within 7 d doubled. Use of modern methods to avoid pregnancy increased from 23.9% to 45.0% (PRR = 1.88 [95% CI 1.63-2.17]), and unmet need for contraception was reduced from 61.7% to 40.5%, a relative reduction of 35% (95% CI 28%-40%). Attendance at birth by those trained to deliver elements of emergency obstetric care increased almost 10-fold, from 5.1% to 48.7% (PRR = 9.55 [95% CI 7.21-12.64]).
Coverage of maternal health interventions and higher-level care at birth was substantially higher during the project period. The MOM Project's focus on task-shifting, capacity building, and empowerment at the community level might serve as a model approach for similarly constrained settings.
缅甸各地的基本产妇和生殖健康护理服务很差,但在东部边境地区的国内流离失所社区中尤其缺乏。在这种环境下,迫切需要创新的策略来接触弱势群体并提供基本公共卫生干预措施。
2005 年至 2008 年间,来自掸邦、孟邦、克伦邦和克伦尼邦的四个族裔健康组织合作开展了一个试点项目,以探讨在缅甸东部复杂紧急情况下,通过社区为基础的三级提供者网络提供产妇保健干预措施的可行性。在项目实施前后,对生育年龄(15-45 岁)的已婚妇女进行了两次两阶段的集群抽样调查,评估了基本产前护理干预措施的覆盖范围、接受过管理并发症培训的人在分娩时的参与度、产后护理和计划生育服务的变化。
在 2006 年和 2008 年分别有 2889 名和 2442 名生育年龄的妇女中,人口特征(年龄、婚姻状况、族裔分布、文化程度)相似。与基线相比,在实施期间最近一次怀孕的妇女接受产前护理的可能性要大得多(71.8%对 39.3%,流行率比[PRR]为 1.83[95%置信区间(CI)1.64-2.04]),并且接受了特定的干预措施,如尿液检测(42.4%对 15.7%,PRR=2.69[95%CI 2.69-3.54])、疟疾筛查(55.9%对 21.9%,PRR=2.88[95%CI 2.15-3.85])和驱虫(58.2%对 4.1%,PRR=14.18[95%CI 10.76-18.71])。产后 7 天内的护理访问次数增加了一倍。现代避孕方法的使用率从 23.9%增加到 45.0%(PRR=1.88[95%CI 1.63-2.17]),未满足的避孕需求从 61.7%减少到 40.5%,相对减少 35%(95%CI 28%-40%)。接受过紧急产科护理培训的人在分娩时的参与度几乎增加了 10 倍,从 5.1%增加到 48.7%(PRR=9.55[95%CI 7.21-12.64])。
在项目期间,产妇保健干预措施和更高层次的分娩护理的覆盖率显著提高。MOM 项目专注于任务转移、能力建设和社区层面的赋权,这可能成为类似受限制环境的一种模式方法。