Suppr超能文献

重新组织大流行病分诊流程,以合乎伦理地最大限度地实现个人的最佳利益。

Reorganising the pandemic triage processes to ethically maximise individuals' best interests.

机构信息

Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2010 Nov;36(11):1966-71. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1986-2. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To provide a revised definition, process and purpose of triage to maximise the number of patients receiving intensive care during a crisis.

METHODS

Based on the ethical principle of virtue ethics and the underlying goal of providing individual patients with treatment according to their best interests, the methodology of triage is reassessed and revised.

RESULTS

The decision making processes regarding treatment decisions during a pandemic are redefined and new methods of intensive care provision recommended as well as recommending the use of a 'ranking' system for patients excluded from intensive care, defining the role of non-intensive care specialists, and applying two types of triage as 'organisational triage' and 'treatment triage' based on the demand for intensive care.

CONCLUSION

Using a different underlying ethical basis upon which to plan for a pandemic crisis could maximise the number of patients receiving intensive care based on individual patients' best interests.

摘要

目的

提供分诊的修订定义、流程和目的,以最大限度地增加危机期间接受重症监护的患者数量。

方法

基于美德伦理的伦理原则和根据患者最佳利益为其提供治疗的基本目标,重新评估和修订分诊方法。

结果

重新定义大流行期间治疗决策的决策过程,并推荐提供重症监护的新方法,以及建议对被排除在重症监护之外的患者使用“排名”系统,定义非重症监护专家的角色,并根据重症监护的需求应用两种类型的分诊,即“组织分诊”和“治疗分诊”。

结论

在为大流行危机做计划时使用不同的潜在伦理基础,可以最大限度地根据患者的最佳利益增加接受重症监护的患者数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验