Critical Care Research Unit, SUHT, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R39. doi: 10.1186/cc10001. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
Triage protocols are only initiated when it is apparent that resource deficits will occur across a broad geographical area despite efforts to expand or acquire additional capacity. Prior to the pandemic the UK Department of Health (DOH) recommended the use of a staged triage plan incorporating Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) developed by the Ontario Ministry of Health to assist in the triage of critical care admissions and discharges during an influenza outbreak in the UK. There are data to suggest that had it been used in the recent H1N1 pandemic it may have led to inappropriate limitation of therapy if surge capacity had been overwhelmed.
We retrospectively reviewed the performance of the Simple Triage Scoring System (STSS) as an indicator of the utilization of hospital resources in adult patients with confirmed H1N1 admitted to a university teaching hospital. Our aim was to compare it against the staged initial SOFA score process with regards to mortality, need for intensive care admission and requirement for mechanical ventilation and assess its validity.
Over an 8 month period, 62 patients with confirmed H1N1 were admitted. Forty (65%) had documented comorbidities and 27 (44%) had pneumonic changes on their admission CXR. Nineteen (31%) were admitted to the intensive care unit where 5 (26%) required mechanical ventilation (MV). There were 3 deaths. The STSS group categorization demonstrated a better discriminating accuracy in predicting critical care resource usage with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (95% confidence interval) for ICU admission of 0.88 (0.78-0.98) and need for MV of 0.91 (0.83-0.99). This compared to the staged SOFA score of 0.77 (0.65-0.89) and 0.87 (0.72-1.00) respectively. Low mortality rates limited analysis on survival predictions.
The STSS accurately risk stratified patients in this cohort according to their risk of death and predicted the likelihood of admission to critical care and the requirement for MV. Its single point in time, accuracy and easily collected component variables commend it as an alternative reproducible system to facilitate the triage and treatment of patients in any future influenza pandemic.
只有在明显出现资源短缺且尽管努力扩大或获取额外能力仍无法覆盖整个广泛地理区域的情况下,才会启动分诊协议。在大流行之前,英国卫生部(DOH)推荐使用包含安大略省卫生部制定的与脓毒症相关的器官衰竭评估(SOFA)的分级分诊计划,以协助在英国流感大流行期间对重症监护病房的入院和出院进行分诊。有数据表明,如果在最近的 H1N1 大流行中使用该计划,可能会导致在出现资源短缺时对治疗进行不适当的限制。
我们回顾性地评估了简单分诊评分系统(STSS)作为指示成人确诊 H1N1 患者入院时医院资源利用的指标的表现,该患者入住大学教学医院。我们的目的是将其与分阶段初始 SOFA 评分过程进行比较,以评估死亡率、重症监护入院需求、机械通气需求,并评估其有效性。
在 8 个月的时间里,有 62 名确诊的 H1N1 患者入院。其中 40 例(65%)有记录的合并症,27 例(44%)入院时胸部 X 光片有肺部浸润。19 例(31%)入住重症监护病房,其中 5 例(26%)需要机械通气(MV)。共有 3 例死亡。STSS 组分类在预测重症监护资源使用方面具有更好的区分准确性,重症监护病房入院的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(95%置信区间)为 0.88(0.78-0.98),需要机械通气的为 0.91(0.83-0.99)。与之相比,分阶段 SOFA 评分分别为 0.77(0.65-0.89)和 0.87(0.72-1.00)。低死亡率限制了对生存率的分析。
STSS 根据患者的死亡风险对该队列中的患者进行了准确的风险分层,并预测了入住重症监护病房和需要机械通气的可能性。它的单点、准确性和易于收集的组成变量使其成为一种替代的可重复系统,可以在未来任何流感大流行中促进患者的分诊和治疗。