• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大流行性流感:人权、伦理与治疗责任。

Pandemic influenza: human rights, ethics and duty to treat.

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Jan;54(1):9-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02163.x. Epub 2009 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02163.x
PMID:19919583
Abstract

The 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic seems to be only moderately severe. In the future, a pandemic influenza with high lethality, such as the Spanish influenza in 1918-1919 or even worse, may emerge. In this kind of scenario, lethality rates ranging roughly from 2% to 30% have been proposed. Legal and ethical issues should be discussed before the incident. This article aims to highlight the legal, ethical and professional aspects that might be relevant to anaesthesiologists in the case of a high-lethality infectious disease such as a severe pandemic influenza. The epidemiology, the role of anaesthesiologists and possible threats to the profession and colleagueship within medical specialties relevant to anaesthesiologists are reviewed. During historical plague epidemics, some doctors have behaved like 'deserters'. However, during the Spanish influenza, physicians remained at their jobs, although many perished. In surveys, more than half of the health-care workers have reported their willingness to work in the case of severe pandemics. Physicians have the same human rights as all citizens: they have to be effectively protected against infectious disease. However, they have a duty to treat. Fair and responsible colleagueship among the diverse medical specialties should be promoted. Until disaster threatens humanity, volunteering to work during a pandemic might be the best way to ensure that physicians and other health-care workers stay at their workplace. Broad discussion in society is needed.

摘要

2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感大流行似乎只是中度严重。未来,可能会出现一种致死率较高的大流行性流感,如 1918-1919 年的西班牙流感,甚至更糟。在这种情况下,提出的致死率范围约为 2%至 30%。在事件发生之前,应该讨论法律和伦理问题。本文旨在强调在严重大流行性流感等高致死性传染病的情况下,与麻醉师相关的法律、伦理和专业方面的问题。本文回顾了流行病学、麻醉师的作用以及与麻醉师相关的医学专业内部对专业和同事关系可能产生的威胁。在历史上的瘟疫流行期间,一些医生的行为就像“逃兵”。然而,在西班牙流感期间,医生们坚守岗位,尽管许多人因此丧生。在调查中,超过一半的医护人员表示愿意在发生严重大流行时工作。医生与所有公民一样享有相同的人权:他们必须得到有效保护,免受传染病的侵害。然而,他们也有责任进行治疗。应该促进不同医学专业之间公平和负责任的同事关系。在灾难威胁到人类之前,自愿在大流行期间工作可能是确保医生和其他医护人员留在工作岗位的最佳方式。需要在社会上进行广泛的讨论。

相似文献

1
Pandemic influenza: human rights, ethics and duty to treat.大流行性流感:人权、伦理与治疗责任。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Jan;54(1):9-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02163.x. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
Duty to care: ethical analysis of the physician's response to an influenza pandemic.注意义务:对医生应对流感大流行的伦理分析。
J La State Med Soc. 2008 May-Jun;160(3):164, 166-70.
4
Swine flu, doctors and pandemics: is there a duty to treat during a pandemic?猪流感、医生与大流行病:大流行期间有治疗的义务吗?
J Law Med. 2010 May;17(5):736-47.
5
Influenza pandemic and professional duty: family or patients first? A survey of hospital employees.流感大流行与职业责任:家人还是患者优先?一项针对医院员工的调查。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Dec 28;6:311. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-311.
6
[Role of primary care physicians in the influenza pandemic].[基层医疗医生在流感大流行中的作用]
Rev Med Suisse. 2007 Apr 11;3(106):910-4.
7
Confronting an influenza pandemic: ethical and scientific issues.应对流感大流行:伦理与科学问题
Biochem Soc Trans. 2006 Dec;34(Pt 6):1151-4. doi: 10.1042/BST0341151.
8
Influenza pandemic and the duties of healthcare professionals.流感大流行与医疗保健专业人员的职责。
Singapore Med J. 2010 Apr;51(4):275-81.
9
The GP's response to pandemic influenza: a qualitative study.全科医生对大流行性流感的应对:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2006 Jun;23(3):267-72. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml014. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
10
Pandemic influenza: is there a duty to stay and treat?大流行性流感:是否有留下来治疗的义务?
J S C Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;105(3):86-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Civil Disobedience in Times of Pandemic: Clarifying Rights and Duties.大流行时期的公民抗命:厘清权利与义务
Crim Law Philos. 2023;17(1):155-174. doi: 10.1007/s11572-021-09592-7. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
2
The principle of salvage in the context of COVID-19.COVID-19 背景下的抢救原则。
Nurs Inq. 2021 Jan;28(1):e12389. doi: 10.1111/nin.12389. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
3
Concerns, perceived impact, and preparedness of oral healthcare workers in their working environment during COVID-19 pandemic.口腔医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间工作环境中的担忧、感知影响和应对准备。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12168. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12168.
4
COVID-19 pandemic: ethical and legal aspects of inadequate quantity and quality of personal protective equipment for resuscitation.COVID-19大流行:复苏时个人防护装备数量和质量不足的伦理与法律问题
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb;74(1):73-75. doi: 10.4097/kja.20379. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
5
Balancing the Duty to Treat Patients with Ebola Virus Disease with the Risks to Dialysis Personnel.平衡治疗埃博拉病毒病患者的责任与透析工作人员面临的风险。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Dec 7;10(12):2263-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03730415. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
6
Legal preparedness: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.法律准备:大流行和灾难期间危重症患者及伤者的护理:CHEST共识声明
Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4 Suppl):e134S-44S. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0741.
7
Reorganising the pandemic triage processes to ethically maximise individuals' best interests.重新组织大流行病分诊流程,以合乎伦理地最大限度地实现个人的最佳利益。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Nov;36(11):1966-71. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1986-2. Epub 2010 Aug 6.