Department of Dental Materials, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, viale Bracci, Siena 53100, Italy.
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Oct;15(5):617-23. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0451-5. Epub 2010 Aug 7.
The study was aimed at assessing the influence of the cement manipulation and ultrasounds application on the bonding potential of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin by microtensile bond strength testing and microscopic observations of the interface. Fifty-six standardized mesio-occlusal class II cavities were prepared in extracted third molars. Class II inlays were made using the nano-hybrid resin composite Gradia Forte (GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan), following the manufacturer's instruction. The sample was randomly divided into two groups (n = 28) according to the luting technique. Half of the specimens were luted under a static seating pressure (P), while the other ones were cemented under vibration (V). The inlays were luted using the following self-adhesive resin cements: G-Cem (G, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) Automix (GA) and Capsule (GC); RelyX Unicem (RU, 3 M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) Clicker (RUC) and Aplicap (RUA). Microtensile sticks and specimens for scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations were obtained from the luted teeth. The interfacial strengths measured for the cements under static pressure or ultrasonic vibration were [median (interquartile range)]: GC/V 4 (2.3-7.9); GC/P 6.8 (4.1-10.1); GA/V 3 (1.9-6.7); GA/P 1.9 (0-5.1); RUC/V 6.6 (4.6-9.8); RUC/P 4.1 (1.8-6.4); RUA/V 6.2 (2.4-10.4); RUA/P 3.4 (0-5.4). The cement formulation influenced dentin bond strength of G. RU bond strength was affected by the luting technique. SEM analysis revealed a homogeneous structure and reduced porosities for both cements as a result of ultrasonic vibration. RU benefited from the application of ultrasounds, while GC achieved higher bond strengths than GA.
本研究旨在通过微拉伸粘结强度测试和界面微观观察评估水泥操作和超声应用对自粘结树脂粘结剂与牙本质粘结潜力的影响。在离体第三磨牙上制备 56 个标准化的近中-颊面点隙 II 类洞型。按照制造商的说明,使用纳米复合树脂复合材料 Gradia Forte(GC 公司,东京,日本)制作 II 类嵌体。根据粘结技术将样本随机分为两组(n = 28)。一半的样本在静态坐压(P)下粘结,另一半在振动(V)下粘结。使用以下自粘结树脂粘结剂粘结嵌体:G-Cem(G,GC 公司,东京,日本)AutoMix(GA)和 Capsule(GC);RelyX Unicem(RU,3M ESPE,塞费尔德,德国)Clicker(RUC)和 Aplicap(RUA)。从粘结牙中获得微拉伸棒和用于扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察的样本。在静态压力或超声振动下测量的粘结剂界面强度为[中位数(四分位间距)]:GC/V 4(2.3-7.9);GC/P 6.8(4.1-10.1);GA/V 3(1.9-6.7);GA/P 1.9(0-5.1);RUC/V 6.6(4.6-9.8);RUC/P 4.1(1.8-6.4);RUA/V 6.2(2.4-10.4);RUA/P 3.4(0-5.4)。水泥配方影响 G 的牙本质粘结强度。RU 的粘结强度受粘结技术的影响。SEM 分析显示,由于超声振动,两种粘结剂的结构均一,孔隙率降低。RU 受益于超声的应用,而 GC 比 GA 获得更高的粘结强度。