Suppr超能文献

注意缺陷障碍与主要情感障碍之间的家族关联证据。

Evidence of familial association between attention deficit disorder and major affective disorders.

作者信息

Biederman J, Faraone S V, Keenan K, Tsuang M T

机构信息

Pediatric Psychopharmacology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991 Jul;48(7):633-42. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810310051009.

Abstract

With the use of family study methods and assessments by "blinded" raters, we tested hypotheses about patterns of familial association between DSM-III attention deficit disorder (ADD) and affective disorders (AFFs) among first-degree relatives of clinically referred children and adolescents with ADD (73 probands, 264 relatives) and normal controls (26 probands, 92 relatives). Among the 73 ADD probands, 24 (33%) met criteria for AFFs (major depression, n = 15 [21%]; bipolar disorder, n = 8 [11%]; and dysthymia, n = 1 [1%]). After stratification of the ADD sample into those with AFFs (ADD + AFF) and those without AFF (ADD), familial risk analyses revealed the following: (1) the relatives of each ADD proband subgroup were at significantly greater risk for ADD than were relatives of normal controls; (2) the age-corrected morbidity risk for ADD was not significantly different between relatives of ADD and ADD + AFF (27% vs 22%); however, these two risks were significantly greater than the risk to relatives of normal controls (5%); (3) the risk for any AFF (bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, or dysthymia) was not significantly different between relatives of ADD probands and ADD + AFF probands (28% and 25%), but these two risks were significantly greater than the risk to relatives of normal controls (4%); (4) ADD and AFFs did not cosegregate within families; and (5) there was no evidence for nonrandom mating. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that ADD and AFFs may share common familial vulnerabilities.

摘要

我们运用家族研究方法并由“盲法”评估者进行评估,对临床转诊的患有注意力缺陷障碍(ADD)的儿童和青少年(73名先证者,264名亲属)以及正常对照者(26名先证者,92名亲属)的一级亲属中,DSM-III注意力缺陷障碍(ADD)与情感障碍(AFFs)之间的家族关联模式的假设进行了检验。在73名ADD先证者中,24名(33%)符合情感障碍的标准(重度抑郁症,n = 15 [21%];双相情感障碍,n = 8 [11%];心境恶劣障碍,n = 1 [1%])。将ADD样本分层为患有情感障碍的(ADD + AFF)和未患有情感障碍的(ADD)后,家族风险分析显示如下:(1)每个ADD先证者亚组的亲属患ADD的风险显著高于正常对照者的亲属;(2)ADD亲属与ADD + AFF亲属经年龄校正后的ADD发病风险无显著差异(27%对22%);然而,这两种风险显著高于正常对照者亲属的风险(5%);(3)ADD先证者亲属与ADD + AFF先证者亲属患任何情感障碍(双相情感障碍、重度抑郁症或心境恶劣障碍)的风险无显著差异(28%和25%),但这两种风险显著高于正常对照者亲属的风险(4%);(4)ADD和情感障碍在家族中并非共同分离;(5)没有证据表明存在非随机婚配。这些发现与ADD和情感障碍可能共享共同家族易感性的假设一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验