Faraone S V, Biederman J, Keenan K, Tsuang M T
Pediatric Psychopharmacology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.
Psychol Med. 1991 Feb;21(1):109-21. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700014707.
Using family study methodology and assessments by blind raters, this study tested hypotheses about patterns of familial association between DSM-III attention deficit disorder (ADD) and antisocial disorders (childhood conduct (CD) and oppositional disorder (OPD) and adult antisocial personality disorder) among 457 first-degree relatives of clinically referred children and adolescents with ADD (73 probands, 264 relatives), psychiatric (26 probands, 101 relatives) and normal controls (26 probands, 92 relatives). Among the 73 ADD probands, 33 (45%) met criteria for OPD, 24 (33%) met criteria for CD, and 16 (22%) had no antisocial diagnosis. After stratifying the ADD sample into those with CD (ADD + CD), those with OPD (ADD + OPD) and those with neither (ADD) familial risk analysis revealed the following: (1) relatives of each ADD proband subgroup were at significantly greater risk for ADD than relatives of both psychiatric and normal controls: (2) the morbidity risk for ADD was highest among relatives of ADD + CD probands (38%), moderate among relatives of ADD + OPD (17%) and ADD probands (24%) and lowest among relatives of psychiatric and normal controls (5% for both); (3) the risk for any antisocial disorder was highest among relatives of ADD + CD (34%) and ADD + OPD (24%) which were significantly greater than the risk to relatives of ADD probands (11%), psychiatric (7%) and normal controls (4%); and (4) both ADD and antisocial disorders occurred in the same relatives more often than expected by chance alone. Although these findings suggest that ADD with and without antisocial disorders may be aetiologically distinct disorders, they are also consistent with a multifactorial hypothesis in which ADD, ADD + OPD and ADD + CD fall along a continuum of increasing levels of familial aetiological factors and, correspondingly, severity of illness.
本研究采用家族研究方法,并由不知情的评估者进行评估,对457名患有注意力缺陷障碍(ADD)的临床转诊儿童和青少年的一级亲属(73名先证者,264名亲属)、患有精神疾病的儿童和青少年的一级亲属(26名先证者,101名亲属)以及正常对照组(26名先证者,92名亲属)中,DSM-III注意力缺陷障碍(ADD)与反社会障碍(儿童期品行障碍(CD)、对立违抗障碍(OPD)和成人反社会人格障碍)之间的家族关联模式假设进行了检验。在73名ADD先证者中,33名(45%)符合OPD标准,24名(33%)符合CD标准,16名(22%)无反社会障碍诊断。将ADD样本分为患有CD的(ADD + CD)、患有OPD的(ADD + OPD)以及两者都没有的(ADD)三组后,家族风险分析显示如下结果:(1)每个ADD先证者亚组的亲属患ADD的风险显著高于精神疾病组和正常对照组的亲属;(2)ADD + CD先证者的亲属中ADD的发病风险最高(38%),ADD + OPD先证者的亲属(17%)和ADD先证者的亲属(24%)中发病风险中等,精神疾病组和正常对照组的亲属中发病风险最低(均为5%);(3)任何反社会障碍的风险在ADD + CD(34%)和ADD + OPD(24%)的亲属中最高,显著高于ADD先证者的亲属(11%)、精神疾病组的亲属(7%)和正常对照组的亲属(4%);(4)ADD和反社会障碍在同一亲属中同时出现的频率高于仅由偶然因素导致的预期频率。尽管这些发现表明伴有和不伴有反社会障碍的ADD可能是病因不同的疾病,但它们也与多因素假说一致,即ADD、ADD + OPD和ADD + CD沿着家族病因因素水平不断增加以及相应疾病严重程度的连续谱分布。