• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估社区人群中心身障碍的患病率。

Estimating the prevalence of personality disorders in the community.

机构信息

McGill University, Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, 4333 chemin de la cote ste. Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, H3T1E4, Canada.

出版信息

J Pers Disord. 2010 Aug;24(4):405-11. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.4.405.

DOI:10.1521/pedi.2010.24.4.405
PMID:20695802
Abstract

A series of recent epidemiological studies has assessed the prevalence of personality disorders in the general population. However, all these reports run a serious risk of overestimation. First, all research is based on problematic definitions in DSM-IV-TR, both for overall PD and for specific categories. Second, all studies suffer from a failure to distinguish problematic traits from clinical disorders. Third, many methods of assessment have been inadequate to make diagnostic decisions requiring subtlety and clinical experience. Overestimation of prevalence negatively affects research, which would benefit from a narrower definition of PDs based on dysfunction in multiple domains.

摘要

最近的一系列流行病学研究评估了一般人群中心理人格障碍的流行率。然而,所有这些报告都存在严重的高估风险。首先,所有研究都基于 DSM-IV-TR 中的有问题的定义,无论是整体 PD 还是特定类别。其次,所有研究都未能区分有问题的特征和临床障碍。第三,许多评估方法都不充分,无法做出需要微妙和临床经验的诊断决策。患病率的高估对研究产生负面影响,而基于多个领域功能障碍的更狭义的 PD 定义将使研究受益。

相似文献

1
Estimating the prevalence of personality disorders in the community.评估社区人群中心身障碍的患病率。
J Pers Disord. 2010 Aug;24(4):405-11. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.4.405.
2
Development and validation of a new procedure for the diagnostic assessment of personality disorder: the Multidimensional Personality Disorder Rating Scale (MPDRS).一种用于人格障碍诊断评估的新方法的开发与验证:多维人格障碍评定量表(MPDRS)。
J Pers Disord. 2008 Jun;22(3):246-58. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2008.22.3.246.
3
Patterns of covariation of DSM-IV personality disorders in a mixed psychiatric sample.混合精神科样本中DSM-IV人格障碍的共变模式。
Compr Psychiatry. 2000 May-Jun;41(3):206-15. doi: 10.1016/S0010-440X(00)90049-X.
4
Diagnostic criteria influence dementia prevalence.诊断标准会影响痴呆症的患病率。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;15(12):1034-45. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31813c6b6c.
5
Parenting behaviors associated with risk for offspring personality disorder during adulthood.与成年后代患人格障碍风险相关的养育行为。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 May;63(5):579-87. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.579.
6
Challenges in operationalizing the DSM-IV clinical significance criterion.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版临床意义标准实施中的挑战
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;61(12):1197-207. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.12.1197.
7
The structure of axis II disorders in adolescents: a cluster- and factor-analytic investigation of DSM-IV categories and criteria.青少年轴II障碍的结构:对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版类别及标准的聚类分析和因素分析研究
J Pers Disord. 2005 Aug;19(4):440-61. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.4.440.
8
[An exploratory study of a personality disorders questionnaire].[一项人格障碍问卷的探索性研究]
Encephale. 2008 Oct;34(5):517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
9
Chronic fatigue syndrome and DSM-IV personality disorders.慢性疲劳综合征与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍
J Psychosom Res. 2009 Jan;66(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
10
Comparing Personality Diagnostic questionnaire-4+ with Longitudinal, Expert, All Data (LEAD) standard diagnoses in a sample with a high prevalence of axis I and axis II disorders.在患有广泛性轴I和轴II障碍的样本中,将人格诊断问卷-4+与纵向、专家、全数据(LEAD)标准诊断进行比较。
Compr Psychiatry. 2000 Jul-Aug;41(4):295-302. doi: 10.1053/comp.2000.0410295.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and incidence of personality disorders among children and adolescents in Danish mental health services: a nationwide register study.丹麦精神卫生服务机构中儿童和青少年人格障碍的患病率和发生率:一项全国性登记研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;33(6):1731-1740. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02274-w. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
2
MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder.摇头丸辅助心理治疗边缘型人格障碍
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2022 Oct;20(4):358-367. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20220056. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
3
Self-selection biases in psychological studies: Personality and affective disorders are prevalent among participants.
心理学研究中的自我选择偏差:人格和情感障碍在参与者中普遍存在。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 8;18(3):e0281046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281046. eCollection 2023.
4
Patient personality characteristics and therapeutic integration: treating borderline personality and emotionally dysregulated-dysphoric personality features.患者人格特征与治疗整合:治疗边缘型人格及情绪调节障碍-烦躁不安型人格特征
Res Psychother. 2022 Jun 30;25(2):611. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2022.611.
5
Dance Movement Therapy for Clients With a Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.针对人格障碍患者的舞蹈动作治疗:一项系统评价与主题综合分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 18;12:581578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.581578. eCollection 2021.
6
Personality Features in Obesity.肥胖中的人格特征。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 14;11:530425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.530425. eCollection 2020.
7
From Child Abuse to Developing Borderline Personality Disorder Into Adulthood: Exploring the Neuromorphological and Epigenetic Pathway.从儿童期受虐到成年期发展为边缘型人格障碍:探索神经形态学和表观遗传学途径。
Cureus. 2020 Jul 30;12(7):e9474. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9474.
8
Barriers and facilitators to employment in borderline personality disorder: A qualitative study among patients, mental health practitioners and insurance physicians.边缘型人格障碍患者就业的障碍和促进因素:一项患者、精神卫生专业人员和保险医师的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 23;14(7):e0220233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220233. eCollection 2019.
9
Experience of Occupations among People Living with a Personality Disorder.人格障碍患者的职业经历。
Occup Ther Int. 2019 Mar 27;2019:9030897. doi: 10.1155/2019/9030897. eCollection 2019.
10
Prevalence, Mortality, and Health Care Use among Patients with Cluster B Personality Disorders Clinically Diagnosed in Quebec: A Provincial Cohort Study, 2001-2012.魁北克临床诊断为B类人格障碍患者的患病率、死亡率及医疗保健利用情况:一项2001 - 2012年的省级队列研究
Can J Psychiatry. 2017 May;62(5):336-342. doi: 10.1177/0706743717700818. Epub 2017 Apr 12.