Centro de Salud Mental de Paterna. Paterna, 46980 Valencia, Spain.
J Pers Disord. 2010 Aug;24(4):499-515. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.4.499.
We studied the reliability and validity of two versions (64 items and 32 items) of the Spanish translation of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-64 and IIP-32) and their usefulness as screening instruments for personality disorders in a sample of 190 outpatients and 66 healthy subjects. Patients were assessed using the IIP-64 and IIP-32, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorder diagnoses, and the Global Assessment of Functioning. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were satisfactory. As theoretically predicted, factor analysis produced eight factors, and multidimensional scaling indicated the two dimensions of affiliation and dominance. Finally, a cutoff point of 87 for the IIP-64 showed 87% sensitivity and 85% specificity, whereas a cutoff point of 44 for the IIP-32 showed 82% sensitivity and 75% specificity. The Spanish versions of the IIP-32 and the IIP-64 are valid instruments for assessing interpersonal problems and for screening personality disorders in clinical practice.
我们研究了两种版本(64 项和 32 项)的《人际关系问题清单》(IIP-64 和 IIP-32)的西班牙语翻译的信度和效度,以及它们作为人格障碍筛查工具在 190 名门诊患者和 66 名健康受试者样本中的有用性。使用 IIP-64 和 IIP-32、DSM-IV 轴 II 人格障碍诊断的结构临床访谈和总体功能评估对患者进行评估。内部一致性和重测信度令人满意。正如理论预测的那样,因素分析产生了八个因素,多维标度表明了两个维度的隶属关系和支配地位。最后,IIP-64 的截断值为 87,灵敏度为 87%,特异性为 85%,而 IIP-32 的截断值为 44,灵敏度为 82%,特异性为 75%。IIP-32 和 IIP-64 的西班牙语版本是评估人际关系问题和筛查临床实践中人格障碍的有效工具。