Department of Psychology, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2011 Feb;128(3):199-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 8.
This study investigated the usefulness of self-report scales for detecting bipolar disorder in several settings.
Study 1 developed a short form of the Hypomanic Personality Scale (the HPS-6) based on clinic/community and undergraduate samples. Study 2 used this scale for recruiting participants with bipolar disorder from the community. Study 3 administered the full-length Hypomanic Personality Scale, the Mood Disorder Questionnaire, and a short form of the General Behavior Inventory (the GBI-15) to an undergraduate sample. Each study featured a reference standard diagnostic interview.
In Study 2, about half of those responding to the advertisement (based on the HPS-6 developed in Study 1) reported a history of at least one hypomanic episode on a telephone-based SCID. In Study 3, the most robust findings emerged for the GBI-15: about one-third of participants screening positive on that measure met criteria for bipolar disorder using the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV (SCID).
Despite large sample sizes and stratified sampling, this study was limited by a low number of participants with bipolar I disorder.
These three studies produced mixed findings regarding the detection of bipolar disorder via self-report. The HPS-6 was reasonably successful in recruiting participants with a history of at least one manic or hypomanic episode into a study on bipolar disorder. The GBI-15 showed some promise as a screening tool in an undergraduate setting, but there is a need for more sensitive and specific scales. Discussion focuses on potential strategies for developing such scales.
本研究调查了自陈量表在多种环境下检测双相障碍的有效性。
研究 1 根据诊所/社区和大学生样本开发了短版 Hypomanic Personality Scale(HPS-6)。研究 2 使用该量表从社区招募双相障碍患者。研究 3 对大学生样本施测完整的 Hypomanic Personality Scale、心境障碍问卷和一般行为量表短版(GBI-15)。每项研究都采用了参考标准诊断访谈。
在研究 2 中,根据研究 1 开发的 HPS-6,约一半回应广告的人(曾有过至少一次轻躁狂发作)在电话 SCID 上报告有过该病史。在研究 3 中,GBI-15 得出了最有力的发现:约三分之一在该测量中呈阳性的参与者符合 DSM-IV 结构临床访谈(SCID)的双相障碍标准。
尽管样本量较大且采用分层抽样,但该研究仍受到双相 I 型障碍参与者数量少的限制。
这三项研究对通过自陈量表检测双相障碍的结果存在差异。HPS-6 成功地招募到至少有一次躁狂或轻躁狂发作病史的参与者参与到一项双相障碍研究中。GBI-15 在大学生环境中作为一种筛查工具显示出了一定的前景,但需要更敏感和特异的量表。讨论重点关注开发此类量表的潜在策略。