Women's Studies Research Center, National Initiative on Gender, Culture and Leadership in Medicine: C-Change, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Dec;25(12):1363-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1478-7. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
Despite compelling reasons to draw on the contributions of under-represented minority (URM) faculty members, US medical schools lack these faculty, particularly in leadership and senior roles.
The study's purpose was to document URM faculty perceptions and experience of the culture of academic medicine in the US and to raise awareness of obstacles to achieving the goal of having people of color in positions of leadership in academic medicine.
The authors conducted a qualitative interview study in 2006-2007 of faculty in five US medical schools chosen for their diverse regional and organizational attributes.
Using purposeful sampling of medical faculty, 96 faculty were interviewed from four different career stages (early, plateaued, leaders and left academic medicine) and diverse specialties with an oversampling of URM faculty.
We identified patterns and themes emergent in the coded data. Analysis was inductive and data driven.
Predominant themes underscored during analyses regarding the experience of URM faculty were: difficulty of cross-cultural relationships; isolation and feeling invisible; lack of mentoring, role models and social capital; disrespect, overt and covert bias/discrimination; different performance expectations related to race/ethnicity; devaluing of research on community health care and health disparities; the unfair burden of being identified with affirmative action and responsibility for diversity efforts; leadership's role in diversity goals; and financial hardship.
Achieving an inclusive culture for diverse medical school faculty would help meet the mission of academic medicine to train a physician and research workforce that meets the disparate needs of our multicultural society. Medical school leaders need to value the inclusion of URM faculty. Failure to fully engage the skills and insights of URM faculty impairs our ability to provide the best science, education or medical care.
尽管有充分的理由借鉴代表性不足的少数族裔(URM)教职员工的贡献,但美国医学院缺乏这些教职员工,尤其是在领导层和高级职位上。
本研究旨在记录 URM 教师对美国学术医学文化的看法和体验,并提高人们对实现让有色人种在学术医学领域担任领导职务这一目标所面临障碍的认识。
作者于 2006 年至 2007 年在美国五所医学院进行了一项定性访谈研究,这些医学院因其地域和组织属性的多样性而被选中。
通过有目的的抽样选择医学教师,从四个不同职业阶段(早期、高原期、领导和离开学术医学)和不同专业的 96 名教师中进行访谈,URM 教师的抽样比例过高。
我们从编码数据中识别出模式和主题。分析是归纳和数据驱动的。
在分析过程中突出的主要主题是:跨文化关系的困难;孤立和无形感;缺乏指导、榜样和社会资本;不尊重、公开和隐蔽的偏见/歧视;与种族/族裔相关的不同绩效期望;贬低社区医疗保健和健康差距方面的研究;因平权行动和多样性努力而被认定和承担责任的不公平负担;领导层在多样性目标中的作用;以及经济困难。
为多元化的医学院教师创造一个包容性的文化环境,将有助于实现学术医学的使命,即培养一支满足我们多元文化社会不同需求的医生和研究人员队伍。医学院领导需要重视 URM 教师的包容。未能充分利用 URM 教师的技能和洞察力,会损害我们提供最佳科学、教育或医疗保健的能力。