Center for Evidence-based Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Dec;25(12):1352-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1476-9. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
Hospital-based comparative effectiveness (CE) centers provide a model that clinical leaders can use to improve evidence-based practice locally. The model is used by integrated health systems outside the US, but is less recognized in the US. Such centers can identify and adapt national evidence-based policies for the local setting, create local evidence-based policies in the absence of national policies, and implement evidence into practice through health information technology (HIT) and quality initiatives. Given the increasing availability of CE evidence and incentives to meaningfully use HIT, the relevance of this model to US practitioners is increasing. This is especially true in the context of healthcare reform, which will likely reduce reimbursements for care deemed unnecessary by published evidence or guidelines. There are challenges to operating hospital-based CE centers, but many of these challenges can be overcome using solutions developed by those currently leading such centers. In conclusion, these centers have the potential to improve the quality, safety and value of care locally, ultimately translating into higher quality and more cost-effective care nationally. To better understand this potential, the current activity and impact of hospital-based CE centers in the US should be rigorously examined.
基于医院的比较效果(CE)中心提供了一种模式,临床领导者可以利用该模式在当地改进基于证据的实践。该模式在美国以外的综合医疗系统中得到应用,但在美国的认知度较低。这些中心可以确定并调整适合当地情况的国家循证政策,在没有国家政策的情况下制定当地循证政策,并通过健康信息技术(HIT)和质量举措将证据付诸实践。鉴于循证证据的日益普及,以及有意义地使用 HIT 的激励措施,该模式对美国从业者的相关性正在增加。在医疗改革的背景下尤其如此,因为改革可能会降低根据已发表的证据或指南被认为不必要的护理费用。运营基于医院的 CE 中心存在挑战,但许多这些挑战都可以通过当前领导这些中心的人开发的解决方案来克服。总之,这些中心有可能在当地提高护理的质量、安全性和价值,最终在全国范围内实现更高质量和更具成本效益的护理。为了更好地理解这种潜力,应该严格审查美国基于医院的 CE 中心的当前活动和影响。