• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[一项关于老年人精神科中Honos65+量表的可靠性、有效性及变化敏感性的多中心研究]

[A multi-centre study of the reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of the honos65+ in psychiatry for older persons].

作者信息

Aartsen M J, Spitsbaard A K, van Baarsen C, Dhondt A D F, Mascini M, Nefs A, Snoeijers A, van Diest M, Wilting R

机构信息

Vrije Universiteit, Fakgroep Sociale Wetenschappen, afeling Sociologie, Amsterdam.

出版信息

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2010;52(8):543-53.

PMID:20697994
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Within the mental health care services for older persons there is a growing need for insight into and evaluation of the results of clinical treatment. The Health of the Nations Outcome Scales 65+ (honos65+) is a promising instrument for the assessment of mental, social and physical health in older persons, but it is not yet known whether it is valid for older persons in the Netherlands.

AIM

To assess the reliability, validity and sensibility to change of the honos65+ when applied to older persons with psychiatric disorders.

METHOD

The bio-psycho-social level of functioning of clients aged 60 and over (n=168) receiving mental health care was assessed by means of existing and validated measuring instruments and the results were compared with those obtained with the honos65+. Three months later the population sample was re-assessed in order to test the extent to which the honos65+ was sensitive to change.

RESULTS

The reliability and validity of the honos65+ could be ascertained for 168 clients aged 60 and over. After three months 116 clients were re-assessed so that the sensitivity of the honos65+ to change could be noted.

CONCLUSION

The honos65+ is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing clients with affective disorders such as depression and anxiety and for detecting changes in clients’ problems and functioning. No conclusions could be reached regarding the reliability and validity of the honos65+ when used for clients with other psychiatric disorders because the clinical subgroups were too small for patterns to be detected.

摘要

背景

在老年人心理健康护理服务中,对临床治疗结果的洞察和评估需求日益增长。《国家健康结果量表65岁及以上版》(honos65+)是评估老年人心理、社会和身体健康的一种有前景的工具,但尚不清楚它对荷兰的老年人是否有效。

目的

评估honos65+应用于患有精神疾病的老年人时的信度、效度和对变化的敏感性。

方法

通过现有的经过验证的测量工具,对接受心理健康护理的60岁及以上客户(n = 168)的生物 - 心理 - 社会功能水平进行评估,并将结果与使用honos65+获得的结果进行比较。三个月后,对总体样本进行重新评估,以测试honos65+对变化的敏感程度。

结果

可以确定honos65+对168名60岁及以上客户的信度和效度。三个月后,对116名客户进行了重新评估,从而可以观察到honos65+对变化的敏感性。

结论

honos65+是评估患有抑郁症和焦虑症等情感障碍的客户以及检测客户问题和功能变化的可靠且有效的工具。对于用于患有其他精神疾病的客户时honos65+的信度和效度,无法得出结论,因为临床亚组规模太小,无法检测出模式。

相似文献

1
[A multi-centre study of the reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of the honos65+ in psychiatry for older persons].[一项关于老年人精神科中Honos65+量表的可靠性、有效性及变化敏感性的多中心研究]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2010;52(8):543-53.
2
Validation of the Greek version of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Elderly People (HoNOS65+, version 3).《健康老龄化国家结局量表(HoNOS65+,第 3 版)》希腊语版本的验证。
Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(2):258-64. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2012.732032. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
3
[Implementation of the HoNOS65+].[《老年人护理需求评估量表65岁及以上版》的实施]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2008;50(2):77-82.
4
[Construction of a scale to signal personality disorders in the elderly].[构建用于识别老年人人格障碍的量表]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 Oct;35(5):186-95.
5
Routine 'Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for elderly people' (HoNOS65+) collection in an acute psychogeriatric inpatient unit in New Zealand.在新西兰一家急性老年精神科住院单元中进行的常规“国民健康老年人结局量表”(HoNOS65+)收集工作。
N Z Med J. 2007 Aug 10;120(1259):U2660.
6
Are the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) useful for measuring outcomes in older people's mental health services?“国民健康结果量表(HoNOS)”对衡量老年人心理健康服务的结果有用吗?
Aging Ment Health. 2004 Sep;8(5):387-96. doi: 10.1080/13607860410001725063.
7
Assessing depression outcome in patients with moderate dementia: sensitivity of the HoNOS65+ scale.评估中度痴呆患者的抑郁结局:HoNOS65+量表的敏感性。
J Neurol Sci. 2009 Aug 15;283(1-2):69-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.02.312. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
8
Clinical utility of Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for older persons in a memory clinic.国家老年人健康结局量表在记忆门诊对老年人的临床应用价值。
Australas Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;17(2):149-55. doi: 10.1080/10398560802482101.
9
[Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].《青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)法语版的翻译与验证》
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):499-505.
10
Development of the self-administered Spanish version of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Older Adults: HoNOS65+A.发展适用于老年人的国家健康结果量表自评版(HoNOS65+A):西班牙语版。
Eur Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;25(3):164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of multidisciplinary psychiatric home treatment for elderly patients with mental illness: a systematic review of empirical studies.多学科精神病学家庭治疗对老年精神疾病患者的疗效:系统评价实证研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 3;19(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2369-z.
2
The effectiveness of assertive community treatment for elderly patients with severe mental illness: a randomized controlled trial.《 对于有严重精神疾病的老年患者,采用坚定的社区治疗的效果:一项随机对照试验》
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Feb 15;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-42.