Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 11;10:476. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-476.
Violence against female sex workers (FSWs) can impede HIV prevention efforts and contravenes their human rights. We developed a multi-layered violence intervention targeting policy makers, secondary stakeholders (police, lawyers, media), and primary stakeholders (FSWs), as part of wider HIV prevention programming involving >60,000 FSWs in Karnataka state. This study examined if violence against FSWs is associated with reduced condom use and increased STI/HIV risk, and if addressing violence against FSWs within a large-scale HIV prevention program can reduce levels of violence against them.
FSWs were randomly selected to participate in polling booth surveys (PBS 2006-2008; short behavioural questionnaires administered anonymously) and integrated behavioural-biological assessments (IBBAs 2005-2009; administered face-to-face).
3,852 FSWs participated in the IBBAs and 7,638 FSWs participated in the PBS. Overall, 11.0% of FSWs in the IBBAs and 26.4% of FSWs in the PBS reported being beaten or raped in the past year. FSWs who reported violence in the past year were significantly less likely to report condom use with clients (zero unprotected sex acts in previous month, 55.4% vs. 75.5%, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3 to 0.5, p < 0.001); to have accessed the HIV intervention program (ever contacted by peer educator, 84.9% vs. 89.6%, AOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.0, p = 0.04); or to have ever visited the project sexual health clinic (59.0% vs. 68.1%, AOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.0, p = 0.02); and were significantly more likely to be infected with gonorrhea (5.0% vs. 2.6%, AOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.3, p = 0.02). By the follow-up surveys, significant reductions were seen in the proportions of FSWs reporting violence compared with baseline (IBBA 13.0% vs. 9.0%, AOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.9 p = 0.01; PBS 27.3% vs. 18.9%, crude OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.5, p < 0.001).
This program demonstrates that a structural approach to addressing violence can be effectively delivered at scale. Addressing violence against FSWs is important for the success of HIV prevention programs, and for protecting their basic human rights.
针对女性性工作者(FSW)的暴力行为可能会阻碍艾滋病预防工作,并侵犯其人权。我们制定了一个多层次的暴力干预措施,针对决策者、二级利益相关者(警察、律师、媒体)和主要利益相关者(FSW),作为涉及卡纳塔克邦 60,000 多名 FSW 的更广泛艾滋病预防计划的一部分。本研究考察了针对 FSW 的暴力行为是否与减少安全套使用和增加性传播感染/艾滋病(STI/HIV)风险有关,以及在大规模艾滋病预防计划中解决针对 FSW 的暴力行为是否可以降低针对她们的暴力行为水平。
FSW 被随机选中参加投票站调查(PBS 2006-2008;匿名进行简短的行为问卷调查)和综合行为生物学评估(IBBA 2005-2009;面对面进行)。
3852 名 FSW 参加了 IBBAs,7638 名 FSW 参加了 PBS。总体而言,11.0%的 IBBAs 中的 FSW 和 26.4%的 PBS 中的 FSW 在过去一年中报告遭受殴打或强奸。在过去一年中报告遭受暴力的 FSW 报告与客户使用安全套的可能性显著降低(过去一个月中零次无保护性行为,55.4%与 75.5%,调整后的优势比(AOR)0.4,95%置信区间(CI)0.3 至 0.5,p<0.001);获得艾滋病毒干预计划(曾被同伴教育者联系过,84.9%与 89.6%,AOR 0.7,95%CI 0.4 至 1.0,p=0.04);或曾去过项目性健康诊所(59.0%与 68.1%,AOR 0.7,95%CI 0.6 至 1.0,p=0.02);并且感染淋病的可能性显著增加(5.0%与 2.6%,AOR 1.9,95%CI 1.1 至 3.3,p=0.02)。在随访调查中,与基线相比,报告暴力的 FSW 比例显著降低(IBBA 13.0%与 9.0%,AOR 0.7,95%CI 0.5 至 0.9,p=0.01;PBS 27.3%与 18.9%,粗比值比(OR)0.5,95%CI 0.4 至 0.5,p<0.001)。
该方案表明,针对暴力行为的结构性方法可以有效地大规模实施。解决针对 FSW 的暴力行为对于艾滋病预防计划的成功以及保护其基本人权非常重要。