National Heart and Lung Institute at Imperial College, London, UK.
Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;20(11):797-803. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
Exposed to a common environment, the IgE-mediated immune response differs, for instance, among sensitized subjects, some of them reacting toward one allergen (monosensitized) whereas others are sensitized to a wide array of allergens (polysensitized). However, a better phenotypic characterization is needed for epidemiologic studies. Using the data collected during the ECRHS I (European Community Respiratory Health Survey), several assessments of skin prick tests and serum-specific IgE to identify mono- and polysensitized patients were compared.
Subjects took part in the ECRHS-I. The CAP-System was used for serum allergen-specific IgE, and allergen-coated Phazet was used for prick tests. Four allergens (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, cat, timothy grass, and Cladosporium) were measured using IgE and nine (the same ones plus olive pollen, birch, Alternaria, Parietaria, and ragweed) were skin tested. One to two local allergens were also tested, depending on countries.
Prevalence of sensitization in 11,355 subjects (34.0 [27.9-40.1] years, 49.9% men) ranged from 32.3% (four specific IgE, 19.3% mono- and 13.0% polysensitized) to 41.8% (four specific IgE combined to nine prick tests, 19.6% mono- and 22.2% polysensitized). Concordance between four specific IgE and four prick tests was weak (weighted κ 0.65 [0.64-0.66]). Concordance between seven and nine prick tests was high (weighted κ 0.99 [0.98-1.00]). Local allergens induced small changes in the prevalence of sensitization, and reclassified some subjects from mono- to polysensitized.
Skin tests or serum-specific IgE may be chosen to identify allergenic sensitivity, mono- and polysensitized subjects without being strictly interchangeable.
暴露于共同环境中,IgE 介导的免疫反应在例如致敏个体中存在差异,其中一些个体对一种过敏原(单致敏)产生反应,而另一些个体则对多种过敏原(多致敏)敏感。然而,为了进行流行病学研究,需要更好地表征表型。利用 ECRHS I(欧洲社区呼吸健康调查)期间收集的数据,比较了几种皮肤点刺试验和血清特异性 IgE 评估方法,以识别单致敏和多致敏患者。
研究对象参加了 ECRHS I。使用 CAP 系统进行血清过敏原特异性 IgE 检测,Phazet 过敏原包被物用于皮肤点刺试验。使用 IgE 测量了四种过敏原(屋尘螨、猫、豚草和枝孢霉),并用皮肤试验测量了九种过敏原(相同的九种加上橄榄油花粉、桦树、交链孢霉、豚草和葎草)。根据国家的不同,还测试了一到两种局部过敏原。
在 11355 名受试者(34.0[27.9-40.1]岁,49.9%为男性)中,过敏发生率从 32.3%(四种特异性 IgE,19.3%单致敏和 13.0%多致敏)到 41.8%(四种特异性 IgE 联合九种皮肤点刺试验,19.6%单致敏和 22.2%多致敏)不等。四种特异性 IgE 与四种皮肤点刺试验之间的一致性较弱(加权 κ 值为 0.65[0.64-0.66])。七种和九种皮肤点刺试验之间的一致性很高(加权 κ 值为 0.99[0.98-1.00])。局部过敏原使过敏发生率的变化很小,并将一些单致敏患者重新分类为多致敏患者。
皮肤试验或血清特异性 IgE 可用于识别过敏敏感性、单致敏和多致敏患者,但不能严格互换。