Ekwall B, Gómez-Lechón M J, Hellberg S, Bondesson I, Castell J V, Jover R, Högberg J, Ponsoda X, Romert L, Stenberg K, Walum E
Department of Toxicology, University of Uppsala, Biomedical Centre, Box 594, S-75124 Uppsala, Sweden.
Toxicol In Vitro. 1990;4(4-5):688-91. doi: 10.1016/0887-2333(90)90143-h.
The multicentre evaluation study of in vitro cytotoxicity tests (MEIC) is organized by the Scandinavian Society of Cell Toxicology. All interested laboratories are invited to test a published list of 50 reference chemicals in their various in vitro assays with a bearing on general toxicity. Submitted results will be centrally evaluated for their relevance to human toxicity, including a comparison with the efficiency of conventional animal tests. This brief communication presents the very first preliminary results of the study, that is, prediction of human acute lethal toxicity for the first 10 MEIC chemicals by all the results submitted to date, that is, five in vitro cytotoxicity assays. As a baseline for judging the efficiency of the cytotoxicity tests, rat and mouse LD(50) values were compared with human acute lethal dosage of the chemicals. Rat LD(50) prediction was relatively poor, but mouse LD(50) values correctly predicted the human lethal dose for six out of the 10 substances. A multivariate method of comparison including all cytotoxicity test results, predicted human lethal blood concentrations as well as the mouse LD(50) prediction of dosage. Since the blood concentrations used in the comparison were derived from human lethal dosage with the help of two simple pharmacokinetic factors (absorbed fraction in the intestine and distribution volume of chemicals), the cytotoxicity assays were found also to be able to predict human dosage, as well as did the mouse LD(50) prediction.
体外细胞毒性试验多中心评估研究(MEIC)由斯堪的纳维亚细胞毒理学协会组织。邀请所有感兴趣的实验室使用与一般毒性相关的各种体外试验方法,对已公布的50种参考化学品清单进行测试。提交的结果将集中评估其与人类毒性的相关性,包括与传统动物试验效率的比较。本简短通讯展示了该研究的首批初步结果,即根据迄今提交的所有结果(即五种体外细胞毒性试验),对MEIC的前10种化学品的人类急性致死毒性进行预测。作为判断细胞毒性试验效率的基线,将大鼠和小鼠的半数致死量(LD50)值与化学品的人类急性致死剂量进行了比较。大鼠LD50预测相对较差,但小鼠LD50值正确预测了10种物质中6种的人类致死剂量。一种包括所有细胞毒性试验结果、预测人类致死血药浓度以及小鼠LD50剂量预测的多变量比较方法。由于比较中使用的血药浓度是借助两个简单的药代动力学因素(肠道吸收分数和化学品分布容积)从人类致死剂量推导而来,因此发现细胞毒性试验也能够预测人类剂量,小鼠LD50预测也是如此。