Aragón Institute of Engineering Research, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Physiol Meas. 2010 Sep;31(9):1271-90. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/9/015. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
In this paper we assessed the possibility of using the pulse rate variability (PRV) extracted from the photoplethysmography signal as an alternative measurement of the HRV signal in non-stationary conditions. The study is based on analysis of the changes observed during a tilt table test in the heart rate modulation of 17 young subjects. First, the classical indices of HRV analysis were compared to the indices from PRV in intervals where stationarity was assumed. Second, the time-varying spectral properties of both signals were compared by time-frequency (TF) and TF coherence analysis. Third, the effect of replacing PRV with HRV in the assessment of the changes of the autonomic modulation of the heart rate was considered. Time-invariant HRV and PRV indices showed no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) and high correlation (>0.97). Time-frequency analysis revealed that the TF spectra of both signals were highly correlated (0.99 +/- 0.01); the difference between the instantaneous power, in the LF and HF bands, obtained from HRV and PRV was small (<10(-3) s(-2)) and their temporal patterns were highly correlated (0.98 +/- 0.04 and 0.95 +/- 0.06 in the LF and HF bands, respectively) and TF coherence in the LF and HF bands was high (0.97 +/- 0.04 and 0.89 +/- 0.08, respectively). Finally, the instantaneous power in the LF band was observed to significantly increase during head-up tilt by both HRV and PRV analysis. These results suggest that although some differences in the time-varying spectral indices extracted from HRV and PRV exist, mainly in the HF band associated with respiration, PRV could be used as a surrogate of HRV during non-stationary conditions, at least during the tilt table test.
在本文中,我们评估了从光体积描记信号中提取的脉搏率变异性(PRV)作为非稳态条件下 HRV 信号替代测量的可能性。该研究基于对 17 名年轻受试者在倾斜台测试期间心率调制中观察到的变化的分析。首先,将 HRV 分析的经典指标与假设稳定的间隔中的 PRV 指标进行了比较。其次,通过时频(TF)和 TF 相干分析比较了两个信号的时变谱特性。第三,考虑了用 HRV 代替 PRV 评估心率自主调节变化的效果。时不变的 HRV 和 PRV 指数没有显示出统计学上的显著差异(p > 0.05),且相关性很高(>0.97)。时频分析表明,两个信号的 TF 谱高度相关(0.99 +/- 0.01);从 HRV 和 PRV 获得的 LF 和 HF 带中的瞬时功率之间的差异很小(<10(-3) s(-2)),且它们的时间模式高度相关(LF 和 HF 带分别为 0.98 +/- 0.04 和 0.95 +/- 0.06),LF 和 HF 带的 TF 相干性较高(分别为 0.97 +/- 0.04 和 0.89 +/- 0.08)。最后,观察到 HRV 和 PRV 分析均表明,在头高位倾斜时,LF 带中的瞬时功率显著增加。这些结果表明,尽管从 HRV 和 PRV 中提取的时变谱指数存在一些差异,主要在与呼吸相关的 HF 带中,但 PRV 可以在非稳态条件下,至少在倾斜台测试期间,用作 HRV 的替代物。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010
Med Eng Phys. 2010-10-25
NPJ Cardiovasc Health. 2025
Sensors (Basel). 2024-11-21
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024-10-19
Sensors (Basel). 2024-9-19
Physiol Meas. 2024-4-8