Suppr超能文献

医疗机构相关利益方对新兴健康信息交换的认知收益:一项定性分析。

Provider stakeholders' perceived benefit from a nascent health information exchange: a qualitative analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.

出版信息

J Med Syst. 2012 Apr;36(2):601-13. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9524-x. Epub 2010 May 22.

Abstract

We sought to better understand the perceived costs and benefits of joining a nascent health information exchange (HIE) from the perspective of potential provider organization participants. We therefore conducted semi-structured interviews with organizational representatives. Interview transcriptions were thematically coded, and coded text was subsequently aggregated to summarize the breadth and depth of responses. Although no respondents expected HIE to result in net financial benefit to their organization, all respondents recognized some potential benefits, and some respondents expected HIE to result in overall organizational benefit. Disproportionate benefit was expected for the poorest, sickest patients. Many respondents had concerns about HIE increasing the risk of data security breaches, and these concerns were most pronounced at larger organizations. We found little evidence of organizational concern regarding loss of patients to other organizations or publication of unfavorable quality data. If HIE's greatest benefactors are indeed the poorest, sickest patients, our current health care financing environment will make it difficult to align HIE costs with benefits. To sustain HIE, state and federal governments may need to consider ongoing subsidies. Furthermore, these governments will need to ensure that policies regulating data exchange have sufficient nationwide coordination and liability limitations that the perceived organizational risks of joining HIEs do not outweigh perceived benefits. HIE founders can address organizational concerns by attempting to coordinate HIE policies with those of their largest founding organizations, particularly for data security policies. Early HIE development and promotional efforts should not only focus on potential benefits, but should also address organizational concerns.

摘要

我们试图从潜在的医疗机构参与者的角度更好地理解加入新生的健康信息交换(HIE)的感知成本和收益。因此,我们对组织代表进行了半结构化访谈。采访记录进行了主题编码,然后对编码文本进行了汇总,以总结回应的广度和深度。尽管没有受访者期望 HIE 会给他们的组织带来净财务收益,但所有受访者都认识到一些潜在的收益,一些受访者期望 HIE 会给组织带来整体收益。最贫穷、最病重的患者将获得不成比例的收益。许多受访者担心 HIE 会增加数据安全漏洞的风险,而且这种担忧在较大的组织中更为明显。我们几乎没有发现组织对患者流失到其他组织或发布不利质量数据的担忧。如果 HIE 的最大受益者确实是最贫穷、最病重的患者,那么我们当前的医疗保健融资环境将使得 HIE 的成本与收益难以匹配。为了维持 HIE,州和联邦政府可能需要考虑持续补贴。此外,这些政府需要确保规范数据交换的政策具有足够的全国协调和责任限制,以使加入 HIE 的组织感知风险不会超过感知收益。HIE 的创始人可以通过尝试协调 HIE 政策与最大创始组织的政策来解决组织的担忧,特别是在数据安全政策方面。早期的 HIE 开发和推广工作不仅应侧重于潜在收益,还应解决组织的担忧。

相似文献

1
Provider stakeholders' perceived benefit from a nascent health information exchange: a qualitative analysis.
J Med Syst. 2012 Apr;36(2):601-13. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9524-x. Epub 2010 May 22.
3
Stakeholders perspectives and deployment strategies of health information exchange illustrated through an in-depth case study of Pakistan.
Inform Health Soc Care. 2020;45(2):130-150. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2019.1582053. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
5
Assessing payer perspectives on health information exchange.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):297-303. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv072. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
8
Usage and effect of health information exchange: a systematic review.
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 2;161(11):803-11. doi: 10.7326/M14-0877.

引用本文的文献

1
The health data utility and the resurgence of health information exchanges as a national resource.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):964-967. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf032.
3
Physician leadership and health information exchange: literature review.
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Aug;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100080.
4
Linking the health data system in the U.S.: Challenges to the benefits.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2017 Oct 14;4(4):410-417. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.09.006. eCollection 2017 Oct 10.
5
Transitioning From Paper to Digital: State Statutory and Regulatory Frameworks for Health Information Technology.
Public Health Rep. 2017 Sep/Oct;132(5):585-592. doi: 10.1177/0033354917722994. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
8
Barriers over time to full implementation of health information exchange in the United States.
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 Sep 30;2(2):e26. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3625.
10
Factors related to health information exchange participation and use.
J Med Syst. 2014 Aug;38(8):78. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0078-1. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
U.S. Regional health information organizations: progress and challenges.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):483-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.483.
2
A state-based approach to privacy and security for interoperable health information exchange.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):428-34. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.428.
3
Privacy as an enabler, not an impediment: building trust into health information exchange.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):416-27. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.416.
5
Evaluating public health uses of health information exchange.
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6 Suppl):S46-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
6
Another lesson from Santa Barbara.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w592-4. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w592. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
7
Retrospective: lessons learned from the Santa Barbara project and their implications for health information exchange.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w589-91. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w589. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
8
The Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange: what happened?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w568-80. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w568. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
9
Toward an effective strategy for the diffusion and use of clinical information systems.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):361-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2254. Epub 2007 Feb 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验