• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往机器人辅助前列腺根治术经验是否会影响机器人辅助膀胱癌根治术的结果?来自国际机器人膀胱癌根治术协会的研究结果。

Does previous robot-assisted radical prostatectomy experience affect outcomes at robot-assisted radical cystectomy? Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.

机构信息

Department of Urologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 2010 Nov;76(5):1111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.010. Epub 2010 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.010
PMID:20709372
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of previous robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) case volume on the outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Little is known regarding the effect of previous robotic surgical experience on the implementation and execution of robot-assisted radical cystectomy.

METHODS

Using the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium database, 496 patients were identified who had undergone robot-assisted radical cystectomy by 21 surgeons at 14 institutions from 2003 to 2009. The surgeons were divided into 4 groups according to their previous RARP experience (≤ 50, 51-100, 101-150, and > 150 cases). The overall operative time, blood loss, lymph node yield, pathologic stage, and surgical margin status were compared among the 4 groups using chi-square analysis.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 386 minutes (range 178-827). The mean estimated blood loss was 408 mL (range 25-3500). The operative time and blood loss were both significantly associated with previous RARP experience (P < .001). The mean lymph node count was 17.8 nodes (range 0-68). Lymph node yield and increased pathologic stage were significantly associated with previous RARP experience (P < .001). Finally, 34 (7.0%) of the 482 patients had a positive surgical margin. Margin status was not significantly associated with previous RARP experience (P = .089).

CONCLUSIONS

Previous RARP case volume might affect the operative time, blood loss, and lymph node yield at robot-assisted radical cystectomy. In addition, surgeons with increased RARP experience operated on patients with more advanced tumors. Previous RARP experience, however, did not appear to affect the surgical margin status.

摘要

目的

评估机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)既往手术例数对机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术结果的影响。机器人手术经验对机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的实施和执行的影响知之甚少。

方法

利用国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟数据库,确定了 496 例患者,这些患者于 2003 年至 2009 年期间,由 14 家机构的 21 名外科医生通过机器人辅助完成根治性膀胱切除术。根据既往 RARP 经验(≤50、51-100、101-150 和>150 例),将外科医生分为 4 组。采用卡方检验比较 4 组之间的总手术时间、出血量、淋巴结产量、病理分期和手术切缘状态。

结果

平均手术时间为 386 分钟(范围 178-827)。平均估计出血量为 408 mL(范围 25-3500)。手术时间和出血量均与既往 RARP 经验显著相关(P<0.001)。平均淋巴结计数为 17.8 个(范围 0-68)。淋巴结产量和增加的病理分期与既往 RARP 经验显著相关(P<0.001)。最后,482 例患者中有 34 例(7.0%)切缘阳性。切缘状态与既往 RARP 经验无显著相关性(P=0.089)。

结论

既往 RARP 病例量可能影响机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的手术时间、出血量和淋巴结产量。此外,RARP 经验增加的外科医生为肿瘤进展程度更高的患者进行手术。然而,既往 RARP 经验似乎不会影响手术切缘状态。

相似文献

1
Does previous robot-assisted radical prostatectomy experience affect outcomes at robot-assisted radical cystectomy? Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.既往机器人辅助前列腺根治术经验是否会影响机器人辅助膀胱癌根治术的结果?来自国际机器人膀胱癌根治术协会的研究结果。
Urology. 2010 Nov;76(5):1111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.010. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
2
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: initial experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术:罗斯威尔帕克癌症研究所的初步经验
Urology. 2007 Mar;69(3):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.037.
3
Is the learning curve of the urology resident for conventional radical prostatectomy similar to that of staff initiating robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?对于传统根治性前列腺切除术,泌尿科住院医师的学习曲线是否与开始机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的医生相似?
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 May-Jun;50(3):335-345. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9909.
4
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
5
Impact of surgeon and volume on extended lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium (IRCC).机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术时外科医生和手术量对扩大淋巴结清扫术的影响:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟(IRCC)的结果。
BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(7):1075-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11583.x. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
6
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era.评估前列腺癌患者行盆腔淋巴结清扫术后的淋巴结检出量:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放根治性前列腺切除术在现代的比较。
J Endourol. 2010 Jul;24(7):1055-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0128.
8
Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.开放性根治性膀胱切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1042-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
9
Surgical margin status after robot assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的手术切缘状态:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的结果。
J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 15.
10
Is patient outcome compromised during the initial experience with robot-assisted radical cystectomy? Results of 164 consecutive cases.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的初步经验是否会影响患者的预后?164 例连续病例的结果。
BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6):882-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09904.x. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Volume-outcome relationship in intra-abdominal robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review.腹腔内机器人辅助手术的量效关系:系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):811-826. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01461-2. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
2
Robotic assisted radical cystectomy: insights on long term oncological outcomes from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术:国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟对长期肿瘤学结果的见解
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Dec;8(Suppl 5):S521-S523. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.05.
3
Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with complete intracorporeal urinary diversion.
机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术并完全体内尿流改道
Asian J Urol. 2016 Jul;3(3):156-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 27.
4
Current Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: What is the Real Benefit?机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的现状:真正的益处是什么?
Yonago Acta Med. 2015 Sep;58(3):95-9. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
5
International Robotic Radical Cystectomy Consortium: A way forward.国际机器人根治性膀胱切除术联盟:前进之路。
Indian J Urol. 2014 Jul;30(3):314-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.134253.
6
Current status of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.机器人辅助膀胱癌根治性切除术的现状。
Nat Rev Urol. 2012 Oct;9(10):573-82. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.144. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
7
Early oncologic outcomes of robotic vs. open radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer.机器人与开放根治性膀胱切除术治疗尿路上皮癌的早期肿瘤学结果。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Aug;31(6):894-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
8
Current status and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道术的现状和结果。
Curr Urol Rep. 2011 Apr;12(2):107-14. doi: 10.1007/s11934-010-0162-0.