• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of surgeon and volume on extended lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium (IRCC).机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术时外科医生和手术量对扩大淋巴结清扫术的影响:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟(IRCC)的结果。
BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(7):1075-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11583.x. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
2
Lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术时的淋巴结切除术:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的结果。
BJU Int. 2011 Feb;107(4):642-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09473.x.
3
Pathologic measures of quality compare favorably in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy to open cystectomy cohorts: a National Cancer Database analysis.在接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的患者中,质量的病理指标与开放性膀胱切除术队列相比具有优势:一项国家癌症数据库分析。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):609-614. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01031-z. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
4
Predictors of adequate lymph node dissection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy and effect on survival.在接受根治性膀胱切除术的非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者中,预测淋巴结清扫充分的因素及其对生存的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;38(10):796.e7-796.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.027. Epub 2020 May 20.
5
Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer with increased nodal yield.机器人辅助扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗淋巴结转移风险增加的膀胱癌。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1802-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09789.x. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
6
Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较疗效
Urol Oncol. 2018 Mar;36(3):88.e1-88.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
7
Impact of Extended Versus Limited Lymph Node Dissection on Surgical Outcome, Recurrence Patterns and Survival After Radical Cystectomy.扩大淋巴结清扫与局限性淋巴结清扫对根治性膀胱切除术后手术结果、复发模式及生存的影响。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2025 Jun;23(3):102337. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102337. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
8
Cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy and standardized extended lymphadenectomy for node-positive bladder cancer: prediction by lymph node positivity and density.根治性膀胱切除术和标准化扩大淋巴结清扫术后淋巴结阳性膀胱癌的癌症特异性生存:通过淋巴结阳性和密度进行预测
BJU Int. 2009 Aug;104(3):331-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08403.x. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
9
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
10
Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.开放性根治性膀胱切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1042-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Volume-outcome relationship in intra-abdominal robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review.腹腔内机器人辅助手术的量效关系:系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):811-826. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01461-2. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
2
Contemporary techniques and outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道的当代技术与结果
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2216-2232. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.45.
3
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis, cumulative analysis, and systematic review.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的体内与体外尿流改道术:荟萃分析、累积分析和系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):321-333. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01174-4. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
4
Is robotic approach useful to palliate advanced bladder cancer? A monocentric single surgeon experience.机器人手术方法对缓解晚期膀胱癌是否有用?单中心单外科医生的经验。
Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(2):113-120. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1902. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
5
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal urinary diversion: surgical and early functional outcomes through the learning curve in a single high-volume center.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合完全腔内尿路改道:单一大容量中心学习曲线内的手术和早期功能结果。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):261-269. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00977-4. Epub 2019 May 23.
6
SIU-ICUD consultation on bladder cancer: treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.国际泌尿外科学会-国际尿路上皮癌联盟咨询意见:膀胱癌治疗——肌层浸润性膀胱癌处理。
World J Urol. 2019 Jan;37(1):61-83. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2606-y. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
7
Surgical techniques for facilitating laparoscopic intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder: initial experience.腹腔镜下腔内原位新膀胱术的手术技术:初步经验。
Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Nov-Dec;44(6):1156-1165. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0505.
8
The growth of computer-assisted (robotic) surgery in urology 2000-2014: The role of Asian surgeons.2000 - 2014年泌尿外科计算机辅助(机器人)手术的发展:亚洲外科医生的作用。
Asian J Urol. 2015 Jan;2(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2014.09.010. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
9
Assessing the relative influence of hospital and surgeon volume on short-term mortality after radical cystectomy.评估医院规模和外科医生手术量对根治性膀胱切除术后短期死亡率的相对影响。
BJU Int. 2017 Aug;120(2):239-245. doi: 10.1111/bju.13804. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
10
Contemporary evidence for robot-assisted radical cystectomy for treating bladder cancer.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的当代证据。
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Sep;13(9):533-9. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.139. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Is patient outcome compromised during the initial experience with robot-assisted radical cystectomy? Results of 164 consecutive cases.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的初步经验是否会影响患者的预后?164 例连续病例的结果。
BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6):882-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09904.x. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
2
Robot assisted extended pelvic lymphadenectomy at radical cystectomy: lymph node yield compared with second look open dissection.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫术:与二次开放解剖相比的淋巴结产量。
J Urol. 2011 Jan;185(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.031. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
3
Early oncological outcomes for bladder urothelial carcinoma patients treated with robotic-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱尿路上皮癌患者的早期肿瘤学结果。
BJU Int. 2011 Feb;107(4):628-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09577.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
4
Lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术时的淋巴结切除术:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的结果。
BJU Int. 2011 Feb;107(4):642-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09473.x.
5
The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的学习曲线:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术协会的结果。
Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58(2):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.024. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
6
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: an expert panel review of the current status and future direction.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术:当前现状和未来方向的专家小组综述。
Urol Oncol. 2010 Sep-Oct;28(5):480-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.11.014. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
7
Robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: surgical and pathological outcomes in 100 consecutive cases.机器人根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:100 例连续病例的手术和病理结果。
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):510-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.027. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
8
Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results.机器人辅助与开放根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的前瞻性随机对照研究:围手术期和病理结果。
Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.024. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
9
Trends in pelvic lymphadenectomy at the time of radical cystectomy: 1988 to 2004.根治性膀胱切除术时盆腔淋巴结清扫术的发展趋势:1988年至2004年。
J Urol. 2009 Jun;181(6):2490-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.031. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
10
The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy.接受根治性膀胱切除术的淋巴结转移患者中淋巴结清扫范围与生存之间的关联。
Cancer. 2008 Jun;112(11):2401-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23474.

机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术时外科医生和手术量对扩大淋巴结清扫术的影响:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟(IRCC)的结果。

Impact of surgeon and volume on extended lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium (IRCC).

机构信息

Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(7):1075-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11583.x. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11583.x
PMID:23442001
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8366553/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Lymph node dissection and it's extend during robot-assisted radical cystectomy varies based on surgeon related factors. This study reports outcomes of robot-assisted extended lymphadenectomy based on surgeon experience in both academic and private practice settings.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of, and predictors for, extended lymph node dissection (LND) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) for bladder cancer, as extended LND is critical for the treatment of bladder cancer but the role of minimally invasive surgery for extended LND has not been well-defined in a multi-institutional setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Used the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium (IRCC) database. In all, 765 patients who underwent RARC at 17 institutions from 2003 to 2010 were evaluated for receipt of extended LND. Patients were stratified by age, sex, clinical stage, institutional volume, sequential case number, and surgeon volume. Logistic regression analyses were used to correlate variables to the likelihood of undergoing extended LND.

RESULTS

In all, 445 (58%) patients underwent extended LND. Among all patients, a median (range) of 18 (0-74) LNs were examined. High-volume institutions (≥100 cases) had a higher mean LN yield (23 vs 15, P < 0.001). On univariable analysis, surgeon volume, institutional volume, and sequential case number were associated with likelihood of undergoing extended LND. On multivariable analysis, surgeon volume [odds ratio (OR) 3.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.37-5.06, P < 0.001] and institution volume [OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.47-4.78, P = 0.001) were associated with undergoing extended LND.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted LND can achieve similar LN yields to those of open LND after RC. High-volume surgeons are more likely to perform extended LND, reflecting a correlation between their growing experience and increased comfort with advanced vascular dissection.

摘要

目的:评估在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)治疗膀胱癌患者中进行扩大淋巴结清扫术(LND)的发生率和预测因素,因为扩大 LND 对膀胱癌的治疗至关重要,但在多机构环境中,微创手术在扩大 LND 中的作用尚未得到很好的定义。

方法:利用国际机器人膀胱癌切除术联盟(IRCC)数据库,对 2003 年至 2010 年期间在 17 个机构接受 RARC 的 765 例患者进行评估,以评估接受扩大 LND 的情况。患者按年龄、性别、临床分期、机构量、序贯病例数和外科医生量进行分层。采用逻辑回归分析将变量与接受扩大 LND 的可能性相关联。

结果:共有 445 例(58%)患者接受了扩大 LND。在所有患者中,中位数(范围)为 18 个(0-74 个)淋巴结被检查。高容量机构(≥100 例)的平均 LN 产量更高(23 比 15,P<0.001)。单变量分析显示,外科医生量、机构量和序贯病例数与接受扩大 LND 的可能性相关。多变量分析显示,外科医生量[优势比(OR)3.46,95%置信区间(CI)2.37-5.06,P<0.001]和机构量[OR 2.65,95%CI 1.47-4.78,P=0.001]与接受扩大 LND 相关。

结论:机器人辅助 LND 可以在 RC 后达到与开放 LND 相似的 LN 产量。高容量外科医生更有可能进行扩大 LND,这反映了他们不断增加的经验与对高级血管解剖学的日益熟悉之间的相关性。