• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偏执思维作为一种启发式方法。

Paranoid thinking as a heuristic.

机构信息

Centro Medico Genneruxi, Via Costantinopoli, Cagliari, Italy.

出版信息

Early Interv Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;4(3):263-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00190.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00190.x
PMID:20712733
Abstract

Paranoid thinking can be viewed as a human heuristic used by individuals to deal with uncertainty during stressful situations. Under stress, individuals are likely to emphasize the threatening value of neutral stimuli and increase the reliance on paranoia-based heuristic to interpreter events and guide their decisions. Paranoid thinking can also be activated by stress arising from the possibility of losing a good opportunity; this may result in an abnormal allocation of attentional resources to social agents. A better understanding of the interplay between cognitive heuristics and emotional processes may help to detect situations in which paranoid thinking is likely to exacerbate and improve intervention for individuals with delusional disorders.

摘要

偏执思维可以被视为个体在压力情境下应对不确定性的一种人类启发式策略。在压力下,个体会倾向于强调中性刺激的威胁价值,并增加对基于偏执的启发式策略的依赖,以解释事件并指导决策。偏执思维也可能因失去好机会的可能性而产生的压力而被激活;这可能导致对社会代理人的注意力资源的异常分配。更好地理解认知启发式和情绪过程之间的相互作用可能有助于检测偏执思维可能加剧的情况,并改善对妄想障碍个体的干预。

相似文献

1
Paranoid thinking as a heuristic.偏执思维作为一种启发式方法。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;4(3):263-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00190.x.
2
The impact of social stress on self-esteem and paranoid ideation.社会压力对自尊和偏执观念的影响。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;44(1):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
3
Is there a functional way of responding to paranoid intrusions? Development of the Reactions to Paranoid Thoughts Scale.是否存在应对偏执性侵扰的功能性方式?偏执思维反应量表的编制。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2010 Jul;15(4):377-96. doi: 10.1080/13546800903378211. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
4
The impact of rumination on state paranoid ideation in a nonclinical sample.反刍对非临床样本状态偏执观念的影响。
Behav Ther. 2013 Sep;44(3):385-94. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
5
An exploratory investigation of real-world reasoning in paranoia.偏执狂中现实世界推理的探索性研究。
Psychol Psychother. 2014 Mar;87(1):44-59. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.2012.02072.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
6
Psychological processes and paranoia: implications for forensic behavioural science.心理过程与偏执狂:对法医行为科学的影响。
Behav Sci Law. 2006;24(3):277-94. doi: 10.1002/bsl.718.
7
Being deluded after being excluded? How emotion regulation deficits in paranoia-prone individuals affect state paranoia during experimentally induced social stress.被排除后感到困惑?易患偏执狂的个体的情绪调节缺陷如何影响实验诱发的社会应激期间的状态偏执。
Behav Ther. 2012 Jun;43(2):329-40. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
8
Paranoid explanations of experience: a novel experimental study.对体验的偏执性解释:一项新颖的实验研究。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2011 Jan;39(1):21-34. doi: 10.1017/S1352465810000457. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
9
Reasoning under uncertainty: heuristic judgments in patients with persecutory delusions or depression.不确定性下的推理:被害妄想症或抑郁症患者的启发式判断
Psychol Med. 2006 Aug;36(8):1109-18. doi: 10.1017/S003329170600794X. Epub 2006 May 31.
10
Emotional, Cognitive and Behavioral Reactions to Paranoid Symptoms in Clinical and Nonclinical Populations.临床和非临床人群对偏执症状的情绪、认知和行为反应。
Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2017 Spring;11(1):29-38. doi: 10.3371/1935-1232-11.1.29.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of the construct of paranoia in a non-clinical sample: validation of the paranoia scale based on a continuum model.非临床样本中偏执观念结构的评估:基于连续体模型的偏执量表验证
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02821-x.
2
Intolerance of uncertainty and psychosis: A systematic review.不确定性不耐受与精神病:一项系统综述。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2025 Jun;64(2):344-354. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12509. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
3
Pandemic Paranoia Scale for Adolescents (PPS-A): An Initial Psychometric Evaluation and Prevalence Study of Adolescents in the United States and United Kingdom.
青少年大流行偏执量表(PPS-A):对美国和英国青少年的初步心理测量评估和流行率研究。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 Nov;52(11):1765-1779. doi: 10.1007/s10802-024-01228-3. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
4
The Pandemic Paranoia Scale (PPS): factor structure and measurement invariance across languages.大流行偏执量表(PPS):跨语言的因子结构和测量不变性。
Psychol Med. 2023 Apr;53(6):2652-2661. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721004633. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
5
Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial.在使用鱼类任务评估精神病患者 JTC 偏倚时存在的问题:一项随机对照试验基线评估的二次分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02959-5.
6
Neurophysiological Correlate of Emotion Regulation by Cognitive Reappraisal and Its Association With Psychotic Symptoms in Early Psychosis.认知重评调节情绪的神经生理相关性及其与早期精神病精神症状的关系。
Schizophr Bull. 2021 Jan 23;47(1):87-96. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa080.
7
Theory of mind, emotion recognition, delusions and the quality of the therapeutic relationship in patients with psychosis - a secondary analysis of a randomized-controlled therapy trial.精神分裂症患者的心理理论、情绪识别、妄想与治疗关系质量——一项随机对照治疗试验的二次分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2482-z.
8
How is paranoia experienced in a student population? A qualitative study of students scoring highly on a paranoia measure.在学生群体中,偏执是如何体验到的?一项对偏执量表得分较高的学生进行的定性研究。
Psychol Psychother. 2021 Mar;94(1):101-118. doi: 10.1111/papt.12250. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
9
Factor mixture analysis of paranoia in young people.青少年妄想的因子混合分析。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;54(3):355-367. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1642-7. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
10
The Relevance of Emotion Regulation in Explaining Why Social Exclusion Triggers Paranoia in Individuals at Clinical High Risk of Psychosis.情绪调节在解释为什么社会排斥会引发精神病高危个体偏执观念方面的相关性。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Jun 6;44(4):757-767. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx135.