• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从 Northwick Park 依赖量表和功能独立性量表推导 Barthel 指数:它们等效吗?

Deriving a Barthel Index from the Northwick Park Dependency Scale and the Functional Independence Measure: are they equivalent?

机构信息

Kings College London, School of Medicine, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation Regional Rehabilitation Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2010 Dec;24(12):1121-6. doi: 10.1177/0269215510375904. Epub 2010 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1177/0269215510375904
PMID:20713435
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to examine the extent of agreement between Barthel Index scores derived from Northwick Park Dependency Scores (NPDS) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ratings, in an inpatient setting.

DESIGN AND SETTING

previously described conversion criteria were applied in a secondary analysis of a large existing dataset, gathered in a tertiary specialist inpatient neurorehabilitation unit.

SUBJECTS

patients with neurological disabilities (N = 1347), mainly following acquired brain injury.

MAIN MEASURES

comparison of Barthel scores derived from the NPDS (rated by nursing staff) and from parallel FIM scores (rated by the therapy team).

RESULTS

very strong intraclass correlations were observed between the total scores (0.93, P<0.001); 95% limits of agreement ranged from -3.53 to 4.90. Item-by-item agreement (linear-weighted Cohen's kappa coefficients) ranged from 0.41 to 0.77, which represents 'moderate' to 'substantial' agreement. A significant bias towards lower NPDS-derived scores (median 10 (interquartile range (IQR) 6-16) compared with median 11 (IQR 7-16) for the FIM-derived score; Wilcoxon z 11.60, P<0.001) was considered most likely to reflect actual differences in patient performance observed by therapy and nursing staff.

CONCLUSIONS

this study demonstrates good overall agreement between the Barthel Index ratings derived from NPDS and FIM scores. However, scores may be affected by differential performance with nursing and therapy staff, and should not automatically be regarded as equivalent.

摘要

目的

在住院环境中,检查诺威治公园依赖评分(NPDS)衍生的巴氏量表评分与功能独立性测量(FIM)评分之间的一致性程度。

设计和设置

在一个大型现有数据集的二次分析中应用了先前描述的转换标准,该数据集是在三级专科住院神经康复病房中收集的。

受试者

患有神经功能障碍的患者(N=1347),主要是后天性脑损伤。

主要测量

比较 NPDS(由护理人员评定)和平行 FIM 评分(由治疗团队评定)得出的巴氏量表评分。

结果

观察到总分之间存在很强的组内相关性(0.93,P<0.001);95%一致性界限范围为-3.53 至 4.90。逐项一致性(线性加权 Cohen's kappa 系数)范围为 0.41 至 0.77,代表“中度”至“高度”一致。NPDS 衍生评分(中位数 10(四分位距(IQR)6-16))明显偏向于较低的评分,而 FIM 衍生评分(中位数 11(IQR 7-16);Wilcoxon z 11.60,P<0.001),这最有可能反映治疗和护理人员观察到的患者表现的实际差异。

结论

本研究表明,NPDS 和 FIM 评分衍生的巴氏量表评分之间总体上具有良好的一致性。然而,评分可能受到与护理和治疗人员的不同表现的影响,不应自动视为等效。

相似文献

1
Deriving a Barthel Index from the Northwick Park Dependency Scale and the Functional Independence Measure: are they equivalent?从 Northwick Park 依赖量表和功能独立性量表推导 Barthel 指数:它们等效吗?
Clin Rehabil. 2010 Dec;24(12):1121-6. doi: 10.1177/0269215510375904. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
2
Can the Northwick Park Dependency Scale be translated to a Barthel Index?北威克依赖量表能否转化为巴氏指数?
Clin Rehabil. 2010 Dec;24(12):1112-20. doi: 10.1177/0269215510371432. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
3
The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale version 2: a clinimetric evaluation in patients with severe complex neurodisability.康复复杂性量表第二版:严重复杂神经残疾患者的临床评估。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;81(2):146-53. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.173716. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Northwick Park Dependency Scale.北威克依赖量表的心理计量学评估。
J Rehabil Med. 2010 Nov;42(10):936-43. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0602.
5
Measuring nursing needs of stroke patients in clinical rehabilitation: a comparison of validity and sensitivity to change between the Northwick Park Dependency Score and the Barthel Index.测量临床康复中中风患者的护理需求:比较诺斯威克公园依赖评分与巴氏指数在有效性及对变化的敏感性方面的差异
Clin Rehabil. 2002 Mar;16(2):182-9. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr474oa.
6
The Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS): a measure of nursing dependency in rehabilitation.诺斯威克公园依赖评分(NPDS):康复中护理依赖的一种度量方法。
Clin Rehabil. 1998 Aug;12(4):304-18. doi: 10.1191/026921598669173600.
7
The Northwick Park Dependency Score and its relationship to nursing hours in neurological rehabilitation.诺斯威克公园依赖评分及其与神经康复护理时长的关系。
J Rehabil Med. 2003 May;35(3):116-20. doi: 10.1080/16501970310010457.
8
Reliability and validity of the Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS) Swedish version 6.0.诺斯威克公园依赖评分(NPDS)瑞典语版本6.0的信度和效度
Clin Rehabil. 2005 Jun;19(4):419-25. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr808oa.
9
Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury.在单次脑损伤后的早期住院康复期间使用巴氏指数和功能独立性测量。
Clin Rehabil. 2006 Feb;20(2):153-9. doi: 10.1191/0269215506cr917oa.
10
Efficiency of specialist rehabilitation in reducing dependency and costs of continuing care for adults with complex acquired brain injuries.专科康复对于降低复杂获得性脑损伤成年患者的依赖性及持续护理成本的效果。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 May;77(5):634-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.073411.

引用本文的文献

1
Pan-European Study on Functional and Medical Recovery and Geriatric Rehabilitation Services of Post-COVID-19 Patients: Protocol of the EU-COGER Study.泛欧研究:新冠后患者的功能和医疗康复及老年康复服务:欧盟-COGER 研究方案。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(5):668-674. doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1607-5.
2
Sleep Disruption After Brain Injury Is Associated With Worse Motor Outcomes and Slower Functional Recovery.脑损伤后睡眠障碍与更差的运动功能预后和更慢的功能恢复相关。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020 Jul;34(7):661-671. doi: 10.1177/1545968320929669. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
3
Supporting the clinical use of the ICF in Japan - development of the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 set, its operationalization through a rating reference guide, and interrater reliability study.
支持国际功能、残疾和健康分类在日本的临床应用 - 制定国际功能、残疾和健康分类通用-30 集的简单直观描述的日文版,通过评级参考指南使其运作,并进行评定者间信度研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4911-6.
4
Necessity to develop a tool to evaluate activity of daily living for electric powered indoor/outdoor chair users.有必要开发一种工具,用于评估电动室内/室外座椅使用者的日常生活活动能力。
Ann Rehabil Med. 2015 Apr;39(2):277-84. doi: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.2.277. Epub 2015 Apr 24.