Suppr超能文献

教育干预后本科学生中风意识的变化。

Changes in stroke awareness among undergraduate students after an educational intervention.

作者信息

Hwang Lih-Lian, Lin Huei-Chia, Tseng Mei-Chiun

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Information and Management, Ming Chuan University, Gui Shan, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Taiwan. 2010 Jun;19(2):90-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated undergraduates'awareness about stroke, the effects of an educational intervention and the difference of measuring tests between recognition and recall.

METHODS

We chose a convenient sample from two classes. One of the classes, the recognition group, was tested by a close-ended questionnaire with multiple choices. The other class, the recall group, was tested via an open-ended questionnaire. Participants completed their pretest and first posttest before and right after the education intervention. Twelve weeks after the intervention, participants were tested again to assess the knowledge retention over time.

RESULTS

Fifty six participants in the recognition group and 53 participants in the recall group completed all three tests. Before the intervention, all respondents in the recognition group could recognize three or more risk factors and at least one warning sign, but in the recall group were only 32% and 72% respectively. After the intervention, the mean scores of first posttest and second posttest were all significant higher than that of pretest in both groups (P less 0.001). Comparisons of mean score of same items in both groups, the mean score of recognition group was significantly higher than that of recall group at each test (all P less 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The intervention improved participants'knowledge towards stroke, even twelve weeks later. Participants obtained higher scores with a close-ended questionnaire than those with an open-ended questionnaire.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了大学生对中风的认知、教育干预的效果以及识别测试和回忆测试之间的差异。

方法

我们从两个班级中选取了一个便利样本。其中一个班级为识别组,通过多项选择题的封闭式问卷进行测试。另一个班级为回忆组,通过开放式问卷进行测试。参与者在教育干预之前和之后立即完成了他们的预测试和第一次后测试。干预十二周后,再次对参与者进行测试,以评估随时间推移的知识保留情况。

结果

识别组的56名参与者和回忆组的53名参与者完成了所有三项测试。干预前,识别组的所有受访者都能识别出三种或更多的风险因素和至少一种警示信号,但在回忆组中,这一比例分别仅为32%和72%。干预后,两组第一次后测试和第二次后测试的平均得分均显著高于预测试(P<0.001)。两组相同项目平均得分的比较中,每次测试识别组的平均得分均显著高于回忆组(所有P<0.001)。

结论

即使在十二周后,干预也提高了参与者对中风的认知。参与者通过封闭式问卷获得的分数高于开放式问卷。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验